He did - good on him for it.

Not rocket science, is it? If our halves and full back backed up we'd have scored another 2 or 3 tries

where we miss shaul imo

An area sneyd needs to improve on too

Logan is definitely an example of our talent-less academy.

Pleased for Logan , The kid did good , Also Michaels best game for us imo.

logan has to keep his place for the rest of the season for me. todays game was he delivers each time he has played for us. you can see we miss snyed when he's not playing. even when he has a poor game he can win it for us. and why why why do we not have someone up westermans, pryce, paea and Houghton backside when going forward? Houghton had to stop running today for players to catch him up for support.

Listen all this backing up the forwards, being able to pass the ball, scoring long-range tries, winning key games is all well and good - but tell me about their "goal line D" and ability to drive the ball out early in sets. This is, after all, the prime function of the backs in a Lee Radford side.

I have posted before that I thought logan was not big or fast enough, on sun he made me eat humble pie, long may it continue

showed some good footwork also
Yeaman would never have scored those two tries. Backing up Michaels to take his pass at pace and quick thinking with as bit of pace for the other try.
Yeaman does nothing but 2metre scoots.