K-Diddy wrote:And you gave a 2 year contract extension to a player with wrecked knees who can't play a full-season. If Pearson wants to spend his money on a player who hasn't had one good season surely that's up to him, good job fees don't count on the cap.
Injuries are part of the game. Campo's injury is to a knee that has not been previously injured I understand. That could not be foreseen. All 30+ players are more prone to injury as you have experienced with Ellis.
As Sneyd was not considered good enough for Salford and only had 2/3 of a good season with Cas his in and out level of performance could have been foreseen. Still as you say Pearson can spend his money as he wants. He has wasted rather a lot though on poor players and having to pay players off.
My previous comment was in response to an FC fan who is disappointed by Sneyd's performance. You then in your usual manner bring in superfluous comments about another team's player which is completely unrelated to the discussion.
Joined: Apr 17 2012 Posts: 5202 Location: Forever in debt to your priceless advice.
Keiththered wrote:Injuries are part of the game. Campo's injury is to a knee that has not been previously injured I understand. That could not be foreseen. All 30+ players are more prone to injury as you have experienced with Ellis. but it has been injured before As Sneyd was not considered good enough for Salford and only had 2/3 of a good season with Cas his in and out level of performance could have been foreseen. Still as you say Pearson can spend his money as he wants. He has wasted rather a lot though on poor players and having to pay players off.
My previous comment was in response to an FC fan who is disappointed by Sneyd's performance. You then in your usual manner bring in superfluous comments about another team's player which is completely unrelated to the discussion.
Well you may throw your rock and hide your hand Workin' in the dark against your fellow man But as sure as God made black and white What's down in the dark will be brought to the light
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 26005 Location: Back in Hull.
I quite happy with Sneyd, bit up and down, but he is young and playing for a new team, he tries things, some don't come off, but he all the skills to be a top class 7 and given time I believe he will be.
Pryce has been as poor the last two games along with a few other more senior players, they all need to step up.
Keiththered wrote:Injuries are part of the game. Campo's injury is to a knee that has not been previously injured I understand. That could not be foreseen. All 30+ players are more prone to injury as you have experienced with Ellis.
As Sneyd was not considered good enough for Salford and only had 2/3 of a good season with Cas his in and out level of performance could have been foreseen. Still as you say Pearson can spend his money as he wants. He has wasted rather a lot though on poor players and having to pay players off.
My previous comment was in response to an FC fan who is disappointed by Sneyd's performance. You then in your usual manner bring in superfluous comments about another team's player which is completely unrelated to the discussion.
The thing with Sneyd is he brings quite a few things to the team that we were missing, he's only 24 & English so not likely to get homesick. IMO worth a punt on, especially if we can get some consistency into his game. As for my 'usual manner' how would you know what that is? I hardly post on here.
I know I am biased but I think that it was malicious. Just hold him down and concede the penalty and professional foul. No need for the rolling over when holding the ankle. From what I've read DM is still in a boot but dispensed with the crutches. I haven't seen the result confirmed only speculation by Peter Smith in the EP
Joined: Apr 08 2006 Posts: 7069 Location: Central Coast
Robert Hicks live on radio yorkshire and available as a podcast on Audio Boom. Says in interview there were 2 deliberate leg twists. Before anyone posts again you need to check it out to have any credibility in posting.
Odemwingie wrote: I hope his career is over.(regarding danny mcguires injury 2010 play offs)
Ewwenorfolk wrote: I'm glad McGuire got injured, hope he's out for about 10 months
Bulls4Champs2010 wrote:Price, Civ, Beaver, Moz and Wiki. Peacock is not in the catagory of these special players.
McLaren_Field wrote: To be fair, their teams are also inconsequential to their own fans judging by the amount of traffic that all the other boards get
Warrington Wolf wrote:If you win the weekly rounds then without doubt you are the champions.
Joined: May 25 2002 Posts: 37704 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
Mrs Barista wrote:I don't doubt he's injured. Extent and severity tannoyed by Leeds management post match was hugely inflammatory before a diagnosis, and inappropriate IMO. Whether he's fit to play Friday or not I doubt he'll play. With us missing Mini and Sneyd, and possibly Pryce, they won't need him.
Doesn't McDermott have some previous in the 'overstating injury' department? IIRC some years ago, after a game against Wire (memory again), did he not claim to have three players with "broken jaws"?
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
cod'ead wrote:Doesn't McDermott have some previous in the 'overstating injury' department? IIRC some years ago, after a game against Wire (memory again), did he not claim to have three players with "broken jaws"?
cod'ead wrote:Doesn't McDermott have some previous in the 'overstating injury' department? IIRC some years ago, after a game against Wire (memory again), did he not claim to have three players with "broken jaws"?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 150 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
