Joined: Aug 01 2005 Posts: 5916 Location: Definately not in the Cuddle Crew
Mrs Barista wrote:Let's see what Phil Webster comes back with. His position of outrage when it was suggested there was no visible council action was extreme. I can't imagine for a second they'll be letting it lie given what he said.
Well i defended Phil Webster when he came on here putting the councils view forward which you then attacked but i can admit when im wrong and its looking like you may of been right on this issue
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
Sebasteeno wrote:Well i defended Phil Webster when he came on here putting the councils view forward which you then attacked but i can admit when im wrong and its looking like you may of been right on this issue
No. What I objected to was the heroic rhetoric. There's been a material breach of a major contract. Action is therefore mandatory, but was presented as "beyond the call of duty" heroism. Now we know the outcome of the FA assessment, action is now assured, right?
Exactly what ive said all along. This should of been a great and triumphant time for City, instead the whole things been soured by Allam and the name change debacle
Exactly what ive said all along. This should of been a great and triumphant time for City, instead the whole things been soured by Allam and the name change debacle
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
