Tinkerman23 wrote:You and a few others on here really do amaze me. How can you can defend the indefensible all the time, and see no wrong, is just laughable. I'm all for people's own opinions, but it's bull , complete bull!
Funny, really, because I find your persistent ridiculing of anything and everything to do with the club quite pathetic.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
Last edited by ccs on Thu May 07, 2015 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Well I have listened to it three times now and basically I guess Radford says Shaul was injured and was dropped for that, but adds that it was also because he was rubbish against Huddersfield while Shaul agrees he has injury issues that he has played with all season but believes he was dropped because of a poor performance against Huddersfiled. I want to believ in my Club and want to get behind them but what a blooming mess and one that could have been sorted by the coach just saying it was a misunderstanding and its sorted. It would have raised a few questions but it would have died away.
Instead we have players being described as nieve, a player being dragged out in front of the media like a naughty school boy, attempts at being funny which where cringe worthy, total confusion and Radio Humberside milking out plight for a its worth. Following his efforts post match last Friday how anyone can defend that interview by our Coach completely beats me it was abysmal!! Just my interpretation I guess but I found it a bit embarrassing!
2016 The Year of the Airlie Bird -on sale NOW, price £15, BUY THE BOOK RE-LIVE THE DREAM!
Last edited by The Dentist Wilf on Thu May 07, 2015 9:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Dentist Wilf wrote:Well I have listened to it three times now and basically I guess Radford says Shaul was injured and was dropped for that, but adds that it was also because he was rubbish against Huddersfield while Shaul agrees he has injury issues that he has played with all season but believes he was dropped because of a poor performance against Huddersfiled. I want to believ in my Club and want to get behind them but what a blooming mess and one that could have been sorted by the coach just saying it was a misunderstanding and its sorted. It would have raised a few questions but it would have died away.
Instead we have players being described as nieve attempts at being funny which where cringe worthy, total confusion and Radio Humberside milking out plight for a its worth. Following his efforts post match last Friday how anyone can defend that interview by our Coach completely beats me it was abysmal!! Just my interpretation I guess but I found it embarrassing!
Pretty much sums up how I feel about it and things in general. Really hard to see any light at the end of the tunnel for me
Joined: Feb 20 2007 Posts: 10540 Location: Hunting Gopher
The Dentist Wilf wrote:Well I have listened to it three times now and basically I guess Radford says Shaul was injured and was dropped for that, but adds that it was also because he was rubbish against Huddersfield while Shaul agrees he has injury issues that he has played with all season but believes he was dropped because of a poor performance against Huddersfiled. I want to believ in my Club and want to get behind them but what a blooming mess and one that could have been sorted by the coach just saying it was a misunderstanding and its sorted. It would have raised a few questions but it would have died away.
Instead we have players being described as nieve, a player being dragged out in front of the media like a naughty school boy, attempts at being funny which where cringe worthy, total confusion and Radio Humberside milking out plight for a its worth. Following his efforts post match last Friday how anyone can defend that interview by our Coach completely beats me it was abysmal!! Just my interpretation I guess but I found it a bit embarrassing!
Pretty much how I see it. Regardless of the appropriateness of attempts at humour and dragging Shaul out, the strangest thing to me is that for a piece supposedly to put the issue to rest, they still said opposing things and actually further muddied the waters rather than explaining anything. Radford said he was left out against Salford for injury concerns, 'Jamie is young and naïve' (bless 'is little cotton socks) 'we can get Jamie out here to clarify things if you like' and 'we can soon solve this'. Duly, out comes Shaul and says he wasn't injured last week and was disappointed not to play, so pretty much exactly what Radford said wasn't the case. So either Shaul's still confused about whether or not he was injured last week and why he didn't play, or he wasn't prepped very well tonight. Those interviews actually make what appeared pretty much a non-issue farcical.
I don't see how anyone can find that interview anything other than embarrassing. Amateurish in the extreme, and indicative of the direction the club is heading in.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
' width=15> 
