hull2524 wrote:Agree with a lot on here but he has a point. Some only come on here when we lose and seem to revel in it just IMO of course
Not afraid to admit that I tend to post more after disappointing defeat. It's human nature I think to be exasperated and driven to make some valid criticism as long as it's reasonably constructive and you say it as you see it. Maybe it's a cathartic thing for the long suffering souls of FC supporters to get some of the angst off their chest. Certainly nothing to revel in, personally just spoils my bloody weekend.
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 26016 Location: Back in Hull.
Just looked at the stats and once again, had more metres, less tackles and more plays than the opposition and lost, that's the same as the Warrington and Salford losses. Forwards all made good metres forward.
Our main problem is that we don't have the skill or power near the line, we have no players capable of breaking the line, our centres are average, backrowers workhorses, we are missing those players with the X factor. The halfs are trying but don't have those runners or line breakers.
Be interesting to see how we go with Shaul back at FB and Rankin in the halfs, which I expect to see for the derby.
Joined: Mar 11 2007 Posts: 5659 Location: Next to Ramsgate Sands c.1850 in West Hull
irregularfella wrote:Nail on head. As others have said its not even lack of effort. Just needs to be channelled in the right way with some direction and guile but we simply are not clever enough, either on the pitch or off it.
Reading this one sentence it's screamingly obvious where the problem lies.
Philip Larkin wrote:
There ain’t no music East side of this city That’s mellow like mine is, That’s mellow like mine.
Dave K. wrote:Just looked at the stats and once again, had more metres, less tackles and more plays than the opposition and lost, that's the same as the Warrington and Salford losses. Forwards all made good metres forward.
Our main problem is that we don't have the skill or power near the line, we have no players capable of breaking the line, our centres are average, backrowers workhorses, we are missing those players with the X factor. The halfs are trying but don't have those runners or line breakers.
Be interesting to see how we go with Shaul back at FB and Rankin in the halfs, which I expect to see for the derby.
The players we have aren't great but better structure would make us much, much better. The whole of SL is bang average now and it wouldn't take much to be consistent top 8 performers. pearson needs to either bin radford now or bring someone more experienced in to work with him. We also desperately need an attacking coach with some experience. radford and last as our first team coaching set up is pitiful
Joined: Oct 19 2003 Posts: 17898 Location: Packed like sardines, in a tin
Jake the Peg wrote:The players we have aren't great but better structure would make us much, much better. The whole of SL is bang average now and it wouldn't take much to be consistent top 8 performers. pearson needs to either bin radford now or bring someone more experienced in to work with him. We also desperately need an attacking coach with some experience. radford and last as our first team coaching set up is pitiful
Must admit I'm coming round to that way of thinking. Going forward we look clueless. I said on Twitter that we're not that far off and the stats show that, but we have nothing when we need to turn the stats into points.
AP needs to exercise his authority and either get rid of Radford or force an attacking coach on him. There's an ok side there that can't convert pressure into tries and that cannot be allowed to continue.
Joined: Jun 14 2005 Posts: 1331 Location: 5 minutes from the KC
We are just so predictable in "attack". There's no craft, skill or spark. It's barge and then kick for the vast majority of the sets. Our passing is pedestrian - the opposition has no trouble in tracking where the ball goes.
You watch Castleford with the ball last night and they looked dangerous. We didn't look like scoring even with a fresh set of six on their 20 yard line.
Chris28 wrote:Must admit I'm coming round to that way of thinking. Going forward we look clueless. I said on Twitter that we're not that far off and the stats show that, but we have nothing when we need to turn the stats into points.
AP needs to exercise his authority and either get rid of Radford or force an attacking coach on him. There's an ok side there that can't convert pressure into tries and that cannot be allowed to continue.
I'm also thinking that way in that there isn't much fundamentally wrong and its this strange paradox (carrying on from last season) where the stats show Hull to be a 7-8 place side but the actual points total is bottom of the table stuff. Perhaps in a different season you could hold on and see if this sorts itself out but there isn't that luxury this season. You can be unlucky - but only for so long and that time is upon us. If there is no return from the Easter weekend then a big shake up of the coaching structure becomes imperative.
Joined: Feb 13 2003 Posts: 1301 Location: Rodley, West Riding
So given Snyed is injured; guess we'll go with Pryce and Rankin in the halves and Shaul back in at full back. That could be interesting, at least Rankin looks to be trying something different.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum