David Burns @bbcburnsy On Mon at 9, More on the Airco Arena evictions and what exactly is going on with Hull's KC stadium. @HullCity @Hullccnews @hullfcofficial
Is there a new story about the KC?
Only listened to the second half of the Burnsey show earlier today where the Airco evictions were being discussed. A guy, presumably Hull City supporter rang in, quite eloquently as it turned out, and mentioned that Hull City (via the SMC) was subsidising the rugby club to the tune of £1,000,000 per year. Burnsey stated that he too thought this was the case. He had incidentally rang various parties, including HCC, the Allams, Adam Pearson etc, etc to speak out about the above and not one single party had taken up his offer to speak on air. The public were also invited to ring it but only affected parties who are vacating the arena bothered.
Joined: Oct 19 2003 Posts: 17898 Location: Packed like sardines, in a tin
Structured wrote:Only listened to the second half of the Burnsey show earlier today where the Airco evictions were being discussed. A guy, presumably Hull City supporter rang in, quite eloquently as it turned out, and mentioned that Hull City (via the SMC) was subsidising the rugby club to the tune of £1,000,000 per year. Burnsey stated that he too thought this was the case. He had incidentally rang various parties, including HCC, the Allams, Adam Pearson etc, etc to speak out about the above and not one single party had taken up his offer to speak on air. The public were also invited to ring it but only affected parties who are vacating the arena bothered.
Call me a bluff old traditionalist, but I'd like to see some evidence of that, plus how it is broken down, if indeed it is true.
Hull City Council wrote:The council has not yet been consulted upon any proposals, however, it is requesting a meeting of the Community Use Rights Liaison Committee with the Stadium Management Committee to consider how the Stadium Management Company intends to meet its commitment to regular and individual users of the Sports Hall within the Community Use Rights obligations that fall upon the company.
Hull City Council is working with the affected organisations to try and provide alternative facilities.
Hull City Council wrote:The council has not yet been consulted upon any proposals, however, it is requesting a meeting of the Community Use Rights Liaison Committee with the Stadium Management Committee to consider how the Stadium Management Company intends to meet its commitment to regular and individual users of the Sports Hall within the Community Use Rights obligations that fall upon the company.
Hull City Council is working with the affected organisations to try and provide alternative facilities.
Structured wrote:Only listened to the second half of the Burnsey show earlier today where the Airco evictions were being discussed. A guy, presumably Hull City supporter rang in, quite eloquently as it turned out, and mentioned that Hull City (via the SMC) was subsidising the rugby club to the tune of £1,000,000 per year. Burnsey stated that he too thought this was the case. He had incidentally rang various parties, including HCC, the Allams, Adam Pearson etc, etc to speak out about the above and not one single party had taken up his offer to speak on air. The public were also invited to ring it but only affected parties who are vacating the arena bothered.
.Burnsie is right up Allam he would black is white if Allam said it was, Burnsie is quick to judge many others on his programme but steers clear of going against Allam
Hull City wrote:The Club can confirm winning the arbitration case against the FA, having proved successfully that the process adopted by the FA was unfair and bias
The arbitration panel ruled unanimously in the Club’s favour, setting the FA’s decision aside, effectively leaving the Club’s original application unanswered. The ball is now in the FA’s possession, with the Club seeking clarification on how the FA will proceed in a fair and un-bias manner.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
Joined: Oct 19 2003 Posts: 17898 Location: Packed like sardines, in a tin
ccs wrote:Here it is....
Hull City wrote:
The Club can confirm winning the arbitration case against the FA, having proved successfully that the process adopted by the FA was unfair and bias
The arbitration panel ruled unanimously in the Club’s favour, setting the FA’s decision aside, effectively leaving the Club’s original application unanswered. The ball is now in the FA’s possession, with the Club seeking clarification on how the FA will proceed in a fair and un-bias manner.
Is that really their press release? Shoddy.
The ball goes into someone else's "court" for starters, just because it's football doesn't mean you change your metaphor, and the words they're looking for are "biased" and "un-biased". 6.5 out of 10.
Plus the judgment says "At this stage of the season, it would be impractical and wholly inappropriate to direct the association to make a fresh decision to take effect during the current season. The club is free to make a new application", suggesting that the ball is now back with City to resubmit their application. Looks like they might end up arguing the toss over who has the ball
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
