Joined: Jan 30 2005 Posts: 7152 Location: one day closer to death
As if Clarkson gives a toss. The man is a multi-millionaire many times over.
I don't go out of my way to watch Top Gear, but I enjoy it now and then. But I've always liked Clarkson, largely for the fact he doesn't give a toss what lefties and/or eternally outraged think of him. I love that so many people get so wound up by him (see this thread for a start!), and meanwhile Top Gear continues to see massive ratings and he rakes in the pennies. Ok, so he spouts pub humour now & then - clearly a helluva lot of people relate to that, given up to 8 million people in the UK watch each episode. Unfortunately the perpetually offended have a loud voice these days.
The BBC have, however, typically ballsed up their reaction. Taking the remaining series off air? Risking their international sales of TG? Killing that massive cash cow? Really? Pathetic. Apologising to Mexico was bad enough.
The irony is all this outrage is probably doing him a favour. Clarkson is receiving more massive publicity and will walk into a multi-million pound deal within days if the BBC give him the boot. The petition to keep him has reached 500,000. No, I haven't signed it. For all of the above, whether Clarkson gets fired or not isn't actually high on my list of concerns.
100% Wire wrote:BBC being as it is these days, they'll replace him with a woman... probably Clare Balding, or Myleene Klass
Myleene Klass would be a wonderful addition to Top Gear. Clarkson would have to stay though, as he'd be able to fawn over her in the right way, while May and Hammond would just be scared of her and too shy to speak.
Think this all rests with the producer. If he's an idiot he'll stick to the possible truth that Clarkson gave him a little slap because he didn't get his food delivered within 3 seconds of him asking for it. If he's got any sense though his report will say that Clarkson was just understandably tired, emotional and hungry and just shouted at him. Big pay rise for the producer, Clarkson gets off again and that last 3 episodes of Top Gear get 25% higher ratings than they would have done without this fuss.
I expect if Clarkson does have to walk over this, he'll probably just retire with his millions and tell the world to do one.
Joined: Jan 15 2007 Posts: 11924 Location: Secret Hill Top Lair. V.2
I think you think that, and opinion aside, and whatever anyone thinks about Clarkson, that's a sad endemic of British journalism.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.
Joined: Jan 30 2005 Posts: 7152 Location: one day closer to death
Sandro II Terrorista wrote:I think you think that, and opinion aside, and whatever anyone thinks about Clarkson, that's a sad endemic of British journalism.
I may not agree with the gist of the Indy at times, but I've always thought of it as a quality publication, and enjoyed many of their articles.
However, a few months of following the Twitter and Facebook feed and I now view them alongside...well, the Beano, frankly. It's awful.
I hope they've mistakenly hired some social media 'guru' because if Indy journos are writing this stuff then things are worse than we think
Not that many others are much better, but the Indy is particularly laughable.
Joined: Jun 19 2002 Posts: 14970 Location: Campaigning for a deep attacking line
Clarkson is one of those who sometimes annoys me and sometimes I enjoy him. Most of the time I've enjoyed watching Top Gear, and the times I haven't have rarely been because of Clarkson (I'm not that interested in watching a supercar go round the track for instance). Most of the time he's annoyed me it's been either comments or his occasional newspaper articles he's done outside the Top Gear show. On the show I've never really minded his laddish behaviour or the jokes. I think sometimes he does it a bit too often, when it's not needed.
I didn't like the nursery rhyme thing, I think that's him trying too hard and it just made him look like a childish idiot.
However, if he's assaulted someone, without serious provocation, then he has to be sacked. No ifs, no buts he's got to go.
If someone assaulted me at work merely over a workplace disagreement then I'd expect them to be sacked. If that has happened I can't see how the BBC can do anything but sack him, or they're leaving themselves open to a constructive dismissal claim from the producer.
Joined: Nov 23 2009 Posts: 12749 Location: The Hamptons of East Yorkshire
I aren't outraged by him. If he came in my local and I didn't know of him I'd garner he was a bit of a tosspot within a fairly short period of time, I believe. He's a type isn't he?
Always helps to like a bit of a jerk-off if you're a bit of a cock yourself. I've found.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 130 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum