Quote:'In areas of Nottingham, Leicester, Manchester, Leeds and Birmingham the increase in the Muslim population who don't drink leads to many pub closures.
'It is exceptionally hard for a publican who has put 10 years of his life into trying to build up a business to accept the inevitability of these tides of history.'
What a prat.
If I have 50,000 potential customers in my catchment area, then it's up to me to attract my share of that trade.
If 25,000 non-drinkers move in to that area, it makes little difference to my trade. It may increase slightly, as non-drinking is not mutually exclusive to visiting pubs, but my 50,000 market is still there.
If 25,000 of my former market move away, and are REPLACED by 25,000 non-drinkers, then my business will be affected. But not by the "increase in the muslim population" but the decrease in target market. For which he can't blame muslims. They may choose to move into a house. But it is not their choice or doing or responsibility if the people next door choose to move out. It's a free country. If his target market moves away, he should castigate his target market for having the temerity to move. Or maybe he thinks someone moving away should be blamed if they "sell to a muslim". Pillock.
No, he is just a small part of the huge lobby that has fought tooth and nail against abolition of the beer tie, and he and they are smarting, and mounting a rearguard action, when CAMRA finally had a substantial victory the other week when the government was defeated in the Commons on pub tenants' rights to exercise a market rent option. That's what's upset him. even this crass and pigheaded government has decided to stop flogging a dead horse and announced they won't overturn the vote, and he doesn't like it.
He also seems to be trying to articulate a yearning for the "good old days" when the area around the pub was heavily populated by good ole white drinking boys, and is railing against the indisputably massive changes in demographics that have occurred in short order in a number of large conurbations. But whilst these changes are a valid topic for discussion, if bringing them into the topic of pubs, it is selective and disingenuous since we all know that the biggest recent influxes of immigrants have been from white, hard-drinking countries such as Poland and other parts of East Europe not noted for abstinence. And they have taken their turn to move, in large numbers, into areas that previously had become largely Asian-populated. So as a country, the target market of potential pubgoers has, far from diminishing, considerably increased.
Yes, if what used to be a noted and busy pub, but has lost its market because only a small percentage of its former locals now bother coming, if it isn't possible to market and attract enough old or new punters into a well-run pub then supply and demand dictates that it must close. But we must be extremely vigilant as the tactics of various pub owners regularly include causng a good pub to become a bad, badly run, pale shadow of a pub, so its trade declines, and then saying tehy have no choice biut to get PP for conversion and sell it as a dwelling, when in fact cashing in on development potential was the actual aim. Again, CAMRA has been having some success so that for example locals can get a pub listed as a community asset etc and while asset stripping (because that is what it is) has done irreparable and widespread damage to the nation's pubs, at least the surviviors belatedly are getting some limited weapons at their disposal to fight against such malpractices.
What has led to legion pub closures is a large mix of things. These include rapacious pubcos, in multi-billion debt, trying to screw tenants to the ground and penalise them for making a successful pub; exorbitant taxation (where CAMRA had another notable victory a year ago in halting, if not yet abolishing, the so called "beer escalator"; the cost of running a pub; rapidly changing social habits; and the widespread availability of cheap alcohol from supermarkets etc.
So far as I know, no significant numbers of former pub regulars have fled the country because of muslims, and if they have then they are terminally stupid as no other country, er, has pubs, so that was a bit self-defeating, I'd say.