Joined: Oct 13 2004 Posts: 36100 Location: Poodle Power!
@airlie_bird wrote:It's interesting to note that most people state that the best players are either half backs or loose men. As loose men used to be creative and not additional props.
Yet some of the greatest players of all time have worn the number 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 shirts without ever really getting the appreciation they deserved. It's these guys who laid the platform for the Lewis, Gregory, Johns, Hanley (depending on the position he played) etc to play so well. Yet when it comes to the honours and the accolades they rarely feature.
I've watched the game since the mid 70s and I've seen some truly great players. But only a handful who I really looked forward to watching (out of a Hull shirt). Hanley was my first non Hull hero. Never forget watching him and meeting him. Lewis was awesome (all be it not so good for Trinity or was he too far ahead of his team mates). The Aussie teams of 78 & 82 were full of amazing players. That said many of the Aussie teams I've seen have had fantastic players in who I feel privileged to have watched. I've always loved the Kiwis and feel the team of 1980 had some extraordinary talent which gets very little recognition compared to today's greats. Obviously the Hull teams benefited greatly from some of them. Fred Ah Kuoi in his prime was brilliant although his stint in the NRL apparently wasn't so great. All said and done the five who have given me the greatest pleasure are Knocker Norton, Peter Sterling, Ellery Hanley, James Leuluai and Darren Lockyer. Not sure any could be absolutely the greatest ever. Today's game is so different to the one I grew up with. I find it amazing how half backs create so little today with 10metres + to play with yet Sterlo, Gregory, Lewis, Millward, Hepworth created so much with so little space.
But I honestly couldn't argue against any that have been mentioned in this thread. Just think of the engine room when thinking about true greats. (Not that I've mentioned many Hahaha)
You're mainly wrong I'm afraid.
Bit stiff to start with but a few games in he was brilliant. Considers some of the games played at Wakefield amongst his best. You're right about his team mates or most of them but some got it - he was the making of Nigel Bell that's for certain. Bloke is a genuine legend at BV along with Ray Price who did similar in a very different way.
Andrew Johns is a genius, he shaped the modern game of how halves play. His vision was better than anybody else that I've seen. Freddie Fitler was a proper stand off, strong, good passer, had a decent short kick and a great awareness. Cameron Smith in a different way is brilliant, he is exceptionally consistent. Doesn't miss tackles, never a bad pass and punishes teams with his kicking. Smith isn't in the same class of the above, but would complete 100 of his 100 attempts at a skill (Except goal kicks, as seen on Saturday!)
Andrew Farrell was a complete player, competent kicker, good passing game and a tough as they come. Sculthorpe was as good as him also. What Mike Gregory lacked behind these two in skill, he made up for in heart, and was a real leader too.
Meninga was unplayable at times, size strength and pace. Davies was crafty and lighting quick, and had a good rugby brain.
Tough to say who was the best, but in my opinion Johns sneaks it, what he couldn't do, wasn't worth learning.
Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:Johns was a great player, but my opinion of him will always be somewhat tainted by the night he spent in Danny Brough's pocket in the 2005 playoffs.
Yes, like Boxing Day 1983 when a then-relatively unknown Kiwi named Gary Freeman (fresh from Kent Invicta) ran rings round (an admittedly hung-over) Wally Lewis for Castleford against Wakefield.
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 18060 Location: On the road
Him wrote:I haven't compared Smith to Gregory in terms of equating them. Just asking why people think he would be so far ahead, to use their own terms, "in a different Galaxy" & "have skills the current England halves could only dream of".
Considering the game is very very different, especially for a halfback, compared to Gregory's day I'm asking why people think Gregory would necessarily fit in/work in a modern team at halfback and definitely why he would be somehow on a level well beyond the current players.
I'm not saying in the slightest that Gregory or any other top player wouldn't have made it today, but as I said in my reply to Voltaire that he couldn't be arsed to reply to, I think some top players from the past would've made it today and some wouldn't and vice versa for the current top players.
Because great players are largely reliant on their individual skill sets - Gregory is no different. Natural ability never goes away regardless of era. Great players often remain at the top for ten years the game changes massively in that time but they seem to find a way of coping.
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
miscreant wrote:Yes, like Boxing Day 1983 when a then-relatively unknown Kiwi named Gary Freeman (fresh from Kent Invicta) ran rings round (an admittedly hung-over) Wally Lewis for Castleford against Wakefield.
That never happened!
Freeman played very well in the game and John Joyner also upped his game but neither eclipsed Lewis who was still the best player ion the pitch that day.
Joined: May 08 2002 Posts: 9565 Location: 10 mins walk from Suncorp Stadium
knockersbump - I started watching in the early 80s. Not a single forward from that time would be first grade if brought forward to today without massive increases in fitness because they played a different sport.
I have watched Aussie GFs from the 90s and if you watch them on video the increase in fitness levels is quite surprising - any "best of" NRL side from the 90s would get murdered today as they just weren't as fit, and the defences were dreadful compared to today.
As I said, if you were around then (by your nickname I assume you were), do you not remember that Eric Grothe was seen as a giant amongst wingers at 14.5 stone in 1982? Meninga was 15 stone 10 (IIRC) on the 82 tour, and seen as a freak, and yet Ryan Hall would outweigh him by more than half a stone.
The easiest way to see how the game has changed is on that video sharing site. Have a look at Canberra Raiders from the 80s, the Broncos with Langer et al in full flight, and any team before them, and its as clear as day if you watch what the defences were doing aginst them that they had acres of space and nobody was anywhere near fit in today's terms.
TBH I find the older stuff more entertaining, and the skills on show more enjoyable to watch. But fitness? Organisation in defence? Some of its almost laughably poor when you look at a whole game.
Yes, players have got bigger and stronger on the whole but you can only judge players by reference to their status in their own era. If you look at old footage from as long as 80 years ago you can find examples of far better than you ever see today and with the old balls that weighed a ton in comparison. So you can find tangible evidence of reduced standards in some areas! So far as the British game is concerned there were more quality players in say the '50s than there have been at any time in the last 40 years, so stand out players in that era were, in my opinion, generally better than our stand out players of today. I recall a testimonial match at Widnes in the '70s when Widnes were "Cup Kings" and Vince Karalius played. Although 20 years older than the Widnes players and off the pace due to age when he tackled them (including then current internationals) he chucked them around like rag dolls. Far stronger than most current players of that era.
Joined: Feb 26 2002 Posts: 948 Location: Strummerville
Cronus wrote:Kevin Sinfield
No, it has to be Sean O'Verated.
More seriously, I can only pick the players I have seen, and I couldn't pick just one, so ...
Andrew Ettinghausen Jason Robinson Mal Meninga Keith Senior Martin Offiah Darren Lockyer Andrew Johns Shane Webke Danny Buderus Kevin Ward Gorden Tallis Adrian Morley Ellery
I just don't understand why people think guys like Gregory would be head and shoulders above anyone else if they were around today.
With modern training etc I'm sure he would still be a very good player in the modern game. But he wouldn't stand out any more than any other good halfbacks these days.
There's a tribute to Gregory on YouTube. Some of the breaks he makes in that video are against pathetic defensive lines. I've seen Richard Horne make breaks like that all through his career against much better defenders, and yet Horne will be remembered as a slightly above average Superleague half back. He also creates a try with a long cut out pass, but he has to turn his back to the defensive line because he can't pass well enough to his right. Hardly "skills that current halves could only dream of."
These players were indeed greats of the game, and should be remembered. They all played their part in pushing the boundaries of the game and were the best of their generation. However it's disrespectful to modern players who are more professional and work much harder to suggest that the old guys would be head and shoulders above if they played today, because it's simply not true.
Joined: Oct 13 2004 Posts: 36100 Location: Poodle Power!
miscreant wrote:Yes, like Boxing Day 1983 when a then-relatively unknown Kiwi named Gary Freeman (fresh from Kent Invicta) ran rings round (an admittedly hung-over) Wally Lewis for Castleford against Wakefield.
Makes great story, not much of it factual. Didn't happen.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
