Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 9721 Location: Cougarville
Standee wrote:selling National Gold Reserves at the bottom of the market, LABOUR setting an unaffordable National Minimum Wage = LABOUR ripping off companies with Corporation Tax = LABOUR generally penalising success to pay for people being workshy = LABOUR
sorry, but facts are facts, even (dick"Ed") Milliband can't even trot out a mascot that he's properly researched.
but no matter, this is RLFans, not the real world, facts are as unwelcome as they are ignored.
You really do not have a clue about politics or economics and the world of business if that is your argument.
But I'll let you develop your argument.
"setting an unaffordable National Minimum Wage " By whose definition? . "ripping off companies with Corporation Tax " Define ripping off because someone must have been somewhere down the line usually the wealth creators i.e. the workers "generally penalising success to pay for people being workshy" Define success and workshy. I know for example of lots of people who are workshy, they let others do all the hard work and they reap the rewards. The trouble with defining success is knowing where the benchmark is. As a rule of thumb those "in power" don't want others to be in a position to usurp them so put obstacles in the way. I suppose success could be defined as removing obstacles depending upon your viewpoint.
regards
and ENJOY your sport
Leaguefan
"The Public wants what the Public gets" - Paul Weller
Richard_delariv wrote:In the pre-1992 polling Kinnock was propped up by Tories flirting with the idea of voting Labour. In the end they didn't and he lost. As well as that his lead wasn't that big anyway. Polls back then were unweighted and they exaggerated Labour's lead. There was no marginal polling either, and it is this that really counts.
Miliband's lead is far less vulnerable as the polls are weighted, he has a big lead in the marginal and he is being propped up by 2m Lib Dem voters from 2010. Unless most of them switch back he wins, irrespective of the damage UKIP do the Tories.
Somewhat off topic, but that's not true about the 1992 polls. They were weighted, their primary problem was they were not accurately weighted. To some degree, this was because they misunderstood the electorate - partly this was due to not picking up on the movements from working to middle class which had happened through the 1980s and would be identified when the next census results were released. So it wasn't a lack of weighting, they weren't that unsophisticated. But, yes, lessons were learned and the 2015 polling should not contain the same sort of surprises.
Whether Miliband can come through debates with Cameron looking like a PM ready to go is another question. One of the reasons I don't like the debates, the need to reduce everything to soundbites apart, is that it focusses far too much on the leader and their own ability to spout bullshit.
"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs."
Joined: May 25 2002 Posts: 37704 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
Standee wrote:selling National Gold Reserves at the bottom of the market, LABOUR setting an unaffordable National Minimum Wage = LABOUR ripping off companies with Corporation Tax = LABOUR generally penalising success to pay for people being workshy = LABOUR
sorry, but facts are facts, even (dick"Ed") Milliband can't even trot out a mascot that he's properly researched.
but no matter, this is RLFans, not the real world, facts are as unwelcome as they are ignored.
The only "fact" you've actually managed in that list is the selling of gold reserves. You also conveniently gorgot that Gordon Brown finally cleared off our War Debt after 60+ years.
The other "fact" you omitted was the simple fact that gold reserves do absolutely nothing while they are sitting in a vault. They don't create wealth, they don't earn anything, the gold just sits there looking pretty. You could accuse the last Labour government of squandering money on silly things like education and healthcare but after 18 years of tory ideologically-driven decline, both sectors were in dire need of massive investment.
Now we've had 4+ years of a tory-led government, guess which two sectors are once again in decline?
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
cod'ead wrote:You also conveniently gorgot that Gordon Brown finally cleared off our War Debt after 60+ years.
No matter what your view of Brown that's the most preposterous argument in his defence I've ever seen. He paid it off when it was due to be paid. And it was a completely trivial amount that was outstanding.
"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs."
Joined: May 25 2002 Posts: 37704 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
The Ghost of '99 wrote:No matter what your view of Brown that's the most preposterous argument in his defence I've ever seen. He paid it off when it was due to be paid. And it was a completely trivial amount that was outstanding.
£45m is a "trivial amount"? And that loan could've run for years and years. Brown didn't "need" to pay it off, he thought it prudent to do so, something no tory had managed. There is also the consideration that some UK banks were thought to be exposed to problems attached to a high gold price
Whatever anyone's thoughts on his selling of gold, the "cost" to the UK was still less than that of Black Wednesday
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
cod'ead wrote:£45m is a "trivial amount"? And that loan could've run for years and years. Brown didn't "need" to pay it off, he thought it prudent to do so, something no tory had managed. There is also the consideration that some UK banks were thought to be exposed to problems attached to a high gold price
Whatever anyone's thoughts on his selling of gold, the "cost" to the UK was still less than that of Black Wednesday
I think most people would agree that around 0.005% of the national budget was trivial in the overall scheme of things.
The US-UK loan required 50 annual installments from 1950. With repayment deferred in six years in the 50s, 60s and 70s, the final payment eventually fell due in 2006. Which is when Brown repaid it. Hardly an heroic achievement.
"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs."
Ripping off via corporation tax? I remember when all companies, however small, paid 52% and now its 20%. People now want to leave money in companies because the tax rate is so low compared with taking it out. So, if 20% is a rip off I assume Standee has / will never use public transport, the NHS, the education system, rely on the police or emergency services in his hour of need, rely on the intelligence services or armed forces to keep him safe, expect any state pension in future, etc, etc.
cod'ead wrote:£45m is a "trivial amount"? And that loan could've run for years and years. Brown didn't "need" to pay it off, he thought it prudent to do so, something no tory had managed. There is also the consideration that some UK banks were thought to be exposed to problems attached to a high gold price
Whatever anyone's thoughts on his selling of gold, the "cost" to the UK was still less than that of Black Wednesday
Joined: May 25 2002 Posts: 37704 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
Dally wrote:Utterly trivial in the context of current debt!!
Agreed but we had chances to finally shake off that yoke in previous years and dodged them
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum