As the original thread relating to this has been locked, can I mention that the full facts are hopefully now going to emerge, as the inquest into the death of Nurse Saldanha has started, for those (many) who were interested in the topic. All I'll say until the verdict is out is I'll be following it with interest, and to point out that the sub judice rule applies to inquests too.

As the original thread relating to this has been locked, can I mention that the full facts are hopefully now going to emerge, as the inquest into the death of Nurse Saldanha has started, for those (many) who were interested in the topic. All I'll say until the verdict is out is I'll be following it with interest, and to point out that the sub judice rule applies to inquests too.

not again. please.

Why?

Well, because it interests me



No, not again, there's been no previous inquest.

But why does it interest you?

I believe FA is a lawyer, and I imagine this inquest could raise important legal issues that may be relevant to his job.

Or he may just be an inquest junkie

I think first, the deceased was unfairly maligned after her death, and second, nobody took responsibility in any meaningful way. I am particularly interested therefore in what comes out and what conclusions are reached in relation to the behaviour of the radio station bosses and any part their decision to broadcast the call may or may not have played in her death.

And I thought as the original events were of such keen interest to posters on here, the resumed inquest might well be, too.

I'm not sure why a few seem so keen to know, though that there should be an inquest into my reasons for starting a thread about an inquest, that's a bit weird. Do we need to state reasons? If anyone is interested fair enough, if not the thread will drop off. What is the issue?

When I saw the news about the only response is to think that the only reason this is on TV is because it involves the royals. That was why I was puzzled why you'd be so interested in this.

Then I have a look at the other thread and see you were involved in dumb arguments about it before and I guess you're wanting even more dumb arguments about it now. Now I understand why you're so interested in the inquest.

Well if that's the case, he certainly seems to have found one candidate already

I hesitate to disagree given that you're a specialist in making dumb arguments, but I'd say what would be dumb is when one person states why they are interested in a subject, and then another person completely ignores this information and instead posts a fatuous troll.