I have asked this before, but have slept since then and don't fancy trawling back thru 69 pages.
I'm looking at getting a prime lens, primarily for shooting in low light/night photography. What focal length is best to go for, 35 or 50mm, and is about £120-140 enough to pay for a lens like that?
Joined: Mar 08 2002 Posts: 26578 Location: On the set of NEDS...
Mike Oxlong wrote:I have asked this before, but have slept since then and don't fancy trawling back thru 69 pages.
I'm looking at getting a prime lens, primarily for shooting in low light/night photography. What focal length is best to go for, 35 or 50mm, and is about £120-140 enough to pay for a lens like that?
It's for a Nikon D5000 btw.
Plenty of bargain 50mm f1.8 lenses around mate, usually quite cheap
Mike Oxlong wrote:I have asked this before, but have slept since then and don't fancy trawling back thru 69 pages.
I'm looking at getting a prime lens, primarily for shooting in low light/night photography. What focal length is best to go for, 35 or 50mm, and is about £120-140 enough to pay for a lens like that?
It's for a Nikon D5000 btw.
On film SLR cameras, a 50mm lens was considered to be about the same angle of vision as the eye would normally see, a 28mm was considered "wide angle" etc etc. On digital cameras though, the ratio is 1 : 1.6, so a 35mm lens for digital would be nearer to the normal "eye" angle of vision.
For low-light use, you need to think more about aperture size, i.e. the lower the f-number of the lens, the wider its maximum aperture (to let more light in). You can get a Nikon 35mm f1.8 for the money you're talking about. Any bigger aperture and you are then paying a lot more ... or looking at other lens manufacturers.
Freedom without Socialism is privilege and injustice. Socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality.
Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
After being Pentax since 1974 through various film and then digital I have switched to Canon after my Pentax K7 packed up, I have got the 60D with a lens (18-55mm), I would like a zoom up to 300mm, any recommendations out there (up to about £400)
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
Joined: Mar 08 2002 Posts: 26578 Location: On the set of NEDS...
rover49 wrote:After being Pentax since 1974 through various film and then digital I have switched to Canon after my Pentax K7 packed up, I have got the 60D with a lens (18-55mm), I would like a zoom up to 300mm, any recommendations out there (up to about £400)
The EF-S 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS II is a decent lens for walking about, costs around £160, the EF 75-300mm f4-5.6 USM III will set you back a little more but no IS.
Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
Big Graeme wrote:The EF-S 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS II is a decent lens for walking about, costs around £160, the EF 75-300mm f4-5.6 USM III will set you back a little more but no IS.
Cheers BG, will look at some reviews of them, might get two lenses for my budget by the look of it.
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
El Barbudo wrote:On film SLR cameras, a 50mm lens was considered to be about the same angle of vision as the eye would normally see, a 28mm was considered "wide angle" etc etc. On digital cameras though, the ratio is 1 : 1.6, so a 35mm lens for digital would be nearer to the normal "eye" angle of vision.
For low-light use, you need to think more about aperture size, i.e. the lower the f-number of the lens, the wider its maximum aperture (to let more light in). You can get a Nikon 35mm f1.8 for the money you're talking about. Any bigger aperture and you are then paying a lot more ... or looking at other lens manufacturers.
Would a Nikon 35mm f1.8 drastically reduce the need for a tripod for night shots, and reduce the amount of blur caused by any slight shakes while holding the camera instead?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum