Fook ten grand.
I'd thank Mike for the 43k.
Tell him to go and flog his own fooking trainers, then fook off abroad whoring and on the piss for a year.

But hey, that's just me.

I am not surprised.

But thanks for illustrating my points. Even though you'll never begin to have a clue how.

Another company that was like this was Phones4U. It was also not a PLC and John Caudwell did the same sort of thing when he owned it. He set up EBT's and while it was (until the law changed) tax efficient he did it to motivate his employees. He adopted some other scheme to do the same once the EBT mechanism was no longer available. He basically shared the profits amongst the employees.

You are a good example of the BS bomb culture.
Do you really need to laud Caudwell to people?

Alas, Mr Cameron does not want us watching pornography, unless we ask our ISP's nicely if we'd like to watch it, and i'm SURRRRE records of people who have asked for porn to be unblocked would definitely NOT be kept on some sort of 'ayup, he's a pervert/peado' database for future use. No siree bob. I hope nobody here has a r*pe kink either, criminals! We may as well all upsticks to China

I'll explain it to you REALLY SLOWLY so you might actually get the point.

Mike Ashley and the SD board put forward a bonus scheme that was rejected, probably because of the fact that Mike Ashley was awarding himself a bonus of 26 million pounds.

Mike Ashley and the board put forward a second bonus scheme that has regular employees pocketing 43 grand each. THE SIZE OF THE BONUS THAT MIKE ASHLEY IS TO RECEIVE IS NOT STATED.

The fact that you then point to that article with a round of applause for Mike Ashley shows that you are precisely the target audience for BS spread in the media.

Anyone with a working brain reads that article knows that the size of the payout to Ashley needs to be known or there will be suspicion that Ashley is just using the bonus award to the staff as a way to get through his award without people noticing.

I then put to you a blatant example of theft by David Cameron and his buddies of 14 billion pounds from the UK taxpayer which was hidden behind a bribe of 10,000 to each person in the UK.

Your reply then was to joke that you're not bothered by that, screw the 10 grand you're taking the 43 grand bonus, quitting your job and pissing the year away abroad.

Your quoting of DaveO was completely irrelevant. You are too stupid to even understand the basic examples placed in front of you. You try and divert attention from that fact by farting and then sticking your hand in your armpit and making farting sounds.

No one will come to your defence because you are STUPID. No one will come in and say I'm right because I'm a mean bully and I'm picking on a retard.

Now, your next reply is to fart, burp and do a fart noise with you armpit at the same time.

Even I laugh because I can't believe you can co-ordinate the three noises at the same time.

There a far, far too many questions to ask Cameron on this subject but I wish someone would nail him to achair in a TV studio and start...

Questions like, "The rape scene in "Straw Dogs" or the rape scene in "The Accused", presumably it will be illegal to hold dvd copies of these films or for TV companies to show those films ever again ?"

or,

"Who is the arbitrator of porn, what is porn, how many companies and individuals who sell porn of any description have contributed to your political party in the past, or will do in future ?"

and,

"Why won't you join the campaign to rid tabloids of their page three photos or condemn online newspaper sites with their obsession with underage daughters of celebrities in swimsuits or gym gear whilst describing them as "leggy beauties" (c. Mintball )"



Its just more soundbite politics with not a thought of how its going to happen - a bit like me walking in the house and declaring that we're all going on holiday to Sandy Lane Barbados and then when the family get all excited saying , "erm, hang on a minute..."

It's total garbage, I agree, if people's "kids" are accessing porn then I suggest the parents are failing in their basic duty, he wont put a minimum price on alcohol, nor will he tax fat f'rs for remaining fat, but he wants to control the internet.

I'm probably one of an increasing majority that think all of the current crop of politicians are just useless bags of wind.

You're a paranoid little twerp.
I don't want people coming to my defence, unlike you, you stupid little fookwit moron.
You're making things up, again, about any bodily functions I might, or might not be be carrying out.

Whether I agree or disagree with your perception of why Ashley is awarding a minimum of 43K to his employees is totally irrelevant.
Like Coddy says it properly suits the company for tax efficiency purposes, but I'll applaud him b'cos I don't know of many other companies who give half their employees who earn under 20 k a year a 43 k bonus, do you?

Paranoid? Do you even know what that means?



Sadly, you need them. Pretty much anyone reading this thread can see that you're an idiot and I'm slapping you around.

Now, I don't need people to defend me because I can READ and UNDERSTAND our discussions. You do need someone to tell you that you are stupid. But the problem is that it's kind of awkward to tell people that they're thick. So they just step back and feel bad for you. While also thinking that you should have spent more time in school and less time sniffing glue.







The employees of SD have had a bumper windfall. That's great for them. Right now.

The details of whether that is actually so great are hidden behind the headlines. The fact that Ashley's first concern was his own pocket suggests something might be amiss.

If next month it emerges that Ashley took home a 50m bonus in his scheme I think he'll be very pleased that the people are as stupid as you.