Quote El Barbudo="El Barbudo"What is "whimsical" about getting rid of hereditary peers?
The scandals we are seeing are not a result of reforms, they are a result of greedy people being happy to use privilege to line their pockets... bear in mind that one of the accused is actually an elected MP.
Cameron highlighted lobbying three years ago and has done absolutely nothing about it ... and the Tories are closing ranks to try and blame the useless Clegg.
Specific and stringent rules are needed as well as equally stringent policing of those rules.
As for Lords reform, it has been stalled since the last election, indeed Cameron enthusiastically but quietly created more peers in his first year year than any PM ever (117 in one year), whilst promising to reduce the number of elected MPs !, which gives a picture of his strange idea of democracy.'"
Yep.
I'd increase the MP's salary from £65k to £100k
Cut the number of Lords from 760 to 350
Give the Lords a salary of £70k
Then stipulate an MP or Lord cannot have an income from any other source, and their and their spouse's bank accounts are open to monitoring by a Parliamentary body.
It probably would cost us more, but combined with elected Lords I think it'd be worth it.
The increase in MP's salary would cost a maximum of £22m, in reality it would be less since Ministers and Committee Chairs receive higher wages anyway
350 Lords @ £70k = £24.5m but Lords currently receive a daily allowance of £300 per day which probably costs around £10m currently.