Joined: May 10 2002 Posts: 47951 Location: Die Metropole
post wrote:Karl Pilkington question spoiler alert : One thing I don't get, if gay blokes aren't attracted to females then why act effeminate and if lesbians aren't attracted to males then why act masculine? If you get why I mean, I'm prepared to get shot to pieces especially from mint ball but its an honest call it naive question.
I know all don't buy most do, my brothers gay and he doesn't come across as, same with my barber and his partner you'd never tell not that I'm bothered anyway.
It's like saying your a staunch vegan but you eat quorn, it's not meat but its very close to it kind of thing.
Oh god – where to start!? And that's not meant as a derogatory comment, BTW.
Well first, why would a hetro male behave in a feminine manner if they liked girls?
The thing is, in my experience (which is not all and everything) people mostly don't 'act' as anything – they're essentially what they are and may or may not act in a way that emphasises that – within cultural models (in effect). So yeah, you'll get the guy (gay or not) who is effeminate and you'll get the guy (gay or not) who is macho.
I hate cliches, but look at Gareth Thomas – he's hardly a cliche of campness, is he? And he's not alone. David Walliams, who is camp but not, apparently, gay.
I think we get very trapped with types and get suckered into seeing most other human beings within a very limited (and limiting) set of templates.
"You are working for Satan." Kirkstaller
"Dare to know!" Immanuel Kant
"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive" Elbert Hubbard
"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." Oscar Wilde
Kosh wrote:Your detailed knowledge of the way my family interacted with my kids is duly noted and, with all due respect, disregarded. Due to being utterly wrong. Both sets of grandparents were aware of our wishes and agreed with them, likewise all other family members and friends who spent any significant time with them at all.
.
I am not going to get into a disagreement with you BUT to be completely genuinely gender neutral IMHO is impossible unless you cut yourself off from traditional society.
You may have done all of the obvious things BUT on a practical level unless you and your wife never wore gender specific clothes your children will automatically have picked up on gender roles.
Did you wear skirts or dresses very often . Who drove the car etc etc
Who had the larger portions of food at mealtimes etc.
To be gender neutral in your parenting would IMHO require such a level of awareness and changes in behaviour that it would make it difficult to function in modern soceity.
If you lived on a desert island you may have a chance
Huddersfield Giants 2013 over achievers
Huddersfield Giants 2014 under achievers ??????????
Joined: Jul 31 2003 Posts: 36786 Location: Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
Durham Giant wrote:Did you wear skirts or dresses very often . Who drove the car etc etc
Neither of us wears skirts or dresses very often. Until relatively recently neither did my daughter. We have two cars and the kids spent more time being driven around by my wife than me.
Durham Giant wrote:Who had the larger portions of food at mealtimes etc.
Seriously, just
Durham Giant wrote:To be gender neutral in your parenting would IMHO require such a level of awareness and changes in behaviour that it would make it difficult to function in modern soceity.
Are you a parent?
Look - I'm aware of certain practical limitations and the influence of outside society. I'm not daft. But in the early years you have near 100% control over the development of your kids. You can absolutely control what ideas and influences they are exposed to, and you are by far and away their most important role model. And we weren't entirely passive, either. We had discussions about gender stereotyping and encouraged them both to be what they wanted to be and not what anyone else thought they ought to be.
I'm not entirely sure what point you're trying to make TBH.
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
Mintball wrote:Oh god – where to start!? And that's not meant as a derogatory comment, BTW.
Well first, why would a hetro male behave in a feminine manner if they liked girls?
The thing is, in my experience (which is not all and everything) people mostly don't 'act' as anything – they're essentially what they are and may or may not act in a way that emphasises that – within cultural models (in effect). So yeah, you'll get the guy (gay or not) who is effeminate and you'll get the guy (gay or not) who is macho.
I hate cliches, but look at Gareth Thomas – he's hardly a cliche of campness, is he? And he's not alone. David Walliams, who is camp but not, apparently, gay.
I think we get very trapped with types and get suckered into seeing most other human beings within a very limited (and limiting) set of templates.
I know what your saying but I've always wondered why gay celebrities like Graham Norton camp it up to high heaven and sort of form people's views on how gays behave and act, now I wonder if people like Gareth Thomas and Stone Wall feel aggrieved at this as its detrimental to the cause so to speak for example:
I saw a piece on Granada Tonight a few years ago about the Manchester Pride Parade and there was a fat 50 year old bloke dressed in silver hot pants, angel wings and a cowboy hat blowing bubbles at the crowd, now if that's not detrimental to the cause of overcoming bigoted views on gays then I don't know what is.
Current thoughts - Mago out or get running up them plantations, get fit or get rid. Maybe a back up halfback, someone with a bit of experience on a short term deal. Big tall strong running second rower, like a McMeekin or Sironen type back rower.
Joined: May 10 2002 Posts: 47951 Location: Die Metropole
post wrote:I know what your saying but I've always wondered why gay celebrities like Graham Norton camp it up to high heaven and sort of form people's views on how gays behave and act, now I wonder if people like Gareth Thomas and Stone Wall feel aggrieved at this as its detrimental to the cause so to speak for example:
I saw a piece on Granada Tonight a few years ago about the Manchester Pride Parade and there was a fat 50 year old bloke dressed in silver hot pants, angel wings and a cowboy hat blowing bubbles at the crowd, now if that's not detrimental to the cause of overcoming bigoted views on gays then I don't know what is.
I honestly think it's as simple as we're all different - and that iLife's some people being camp and others not. Camp is simply one of very many 'types', so to speak.
Unless we genuinely believe that it would be 'better' for every human being to be the same, then it would surely be good to celebrate our differences. There are many things that differentiate us - sexuality/gender is far from the foremost.
"You are working for Satan." Kirkstaller
"Dare to know!" Immanuel Kant
"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive" Elbert Hubbard
"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." Oscar Wilde
Kosh wrote:Neither of us wears skirts or dresses very often. Until relatively recently neither did my daughter. We have two cars and the kids spent more time being driven around by my wife than me.
Seriously, just
Are you a parent?
Look - I'm aware of certain practical limitations and the influence of outside society. I'm not daft. But in the early years you have near 100% control over the development of your kids. You can absolutely control what ideas and influences they are exposed to, and you are by far and away their most important role model. And we weren't entirely passive, either. We had discussions about gender stereotyping and encouraged them both to be what they wanted to be and not what anyone else thought they ought to be.
I'm not entirely sure what point you're trying to make TBH.
You are the one who felt that because you had gender neutral parenting there must be something else at play for them to develop into traditional gender roles i was pointing out that i do not believe that you can be gender neutral in a gender orientated society as there are too many things you cannot control all you can do is mitigate against the worst elements of it which is what you appear to have done by your comment that you do not have barbie and a macho man.
Quote:My wife and I were quite 'right on' when we decided to have kids and went out of our way to avoid the normal gender stereotypes and stereotyping behaviours. I've still ended up with teenagers who are easily recognisable as being of male and female gender.
But there was clearly another factor or factors at work. And I've allowed for peer pressure once they started interacting socially with the world at large.
I was pointing out that gender development effectively starts from day one when a child is born. Regardless of your parenting others will respond to them on the basis of their perceptions of gender.
If you called your children by names which identified there sex then people automatically respond to them in different ways.
If your girl was called Jill people say isnt she pretty if your son is called jack people say he looks like his dad. All of that is contributing to the development of gender roles. People talk to children differently depending on their sex which begins to inform their gender awareness as i gave an example in a previous post.
Did your son see you shaving your face and maybe notice his mummy didnt all of this affects awareness of sexual and physical differences and creates within a child that because they have a certain sex then they should behave in a certain way.
Obviously the less things that influence that will manage it as they are younger BUT as soon as they start interacting with wider society then those gender roles start devloping.
You say
Quote:You can absolutely control what ideas and influences they are exposed to, and you are by far and away their most important role model
at what age do you think other things start influencing them. At what stage do you think others start influencing them more. My son was brought up to be a Man United fan, his mum supports them his grandad who he dotes on is a mad Man U fan. I would probably name them as my favoured team. He had man U teddies, wallpaper and quilt cover. He watched Man u games with his mum and grandad. He went to Old Trafford.
Yet when he was 6 his best friend at school persuaded him to support Liverpool in a matter of two weeks. 12 years later he is still a Liverpool fan.
I stick by my point unless you live on a desert island it would be virtually be impossible to protect your children from copying or being aware of gender roles. .
Huddersfield Giants 2013 over achievers
Huddersfield Giants 2014 under achievers ??????????
Mintball wrote:I honestly think it's as simple as we're all different - and that iLife's some people being camp and others not. Camp is simply one of very many 'types', so to speak.
Do you perceive it as detrimental?
Current thoughts - Mago out or get running up them plantations, get fit or get rid. Maybe a back up halfback, someone with a bit of experience on a short term deal. Big tall strong running second rower, like a McMeekin or Sironen type back rower.
Mintball wrote:That's a different a matter, and based on what society at any one time dreams okay etc. but that has change D and continues to do so.
Best left sidestep since Brad Fitler
Current thoughts - Mago out or get running up them plantations, get fit or get rid. Maybe a back up halfback, someone with a bit of experience on a short term deal. Big tall strong running second rower, like a McMeekin or Sironen type back rower.
Joined: Jan 15 2007 Posts: 11924 Location: Secret Hill Top Lair. V.2
post wrote: I saw a piece on Granada Tonight a few years ago about the Manchester Pride Parade and there was a fat 50 year old bloke dressed in silver hot pants, angel wings and a cowboy hat blowing bubbles at the crowd.
Nowt wrong with bears chief.
Do you perceive it as detrimental?[/quote]
No, why do you?
It's fifty year old bloke having what sounds like a top day and more than likely a rather smashing night out.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 132 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum