Just because i dont like Tories does not mean i would not sleep with them.

So the answer to your question is YES.

Manslaughter most likely.

Yep! and proud of it.

As I grew up she took my free school milk off me, started the erosion of free university education, introduced the poll tax, put many of my friends fathers on the dole, condemned many of my contemporaries to a life on benefits, shut the pits, battered the unions, oversaw the demise of manufacturing in this country, sold off all the essential services, deregulated the city letting a bunch of spivs take over... I could go on , but the list is too long! To top it all, her clinging on to life has lost me a fortune in death sweeps!

As for my mother, she didn't destroy the lives and hopes of millions of people!

Are you suggesting if Ian Brady, Myra Hindley, Rose West or Peter Sutcliffe had been executed there was the slightest chance of a miscarriage of justice? These are the types of individuals I am suggesting are suitable for execution.

On the state taking lives - we think it is OK to go and murder innocent people in places like Afghanistan but it not OK to carry out controlled virtually painless death on those convicted of the most serious of crimes?

So where is the common denominator between those four other than the fact that they were convicted of murder, what is the specific part of their crime that make it suitable for the death penalty and other murders not ?

so you hate the tories because they stopped free school milk and shut some pits, yet you vote labour even though they stopped free school milk and shut down more pits. interesting. oh, and that whole 'demise of manufacturing' nonsense is just that.

Remind us again, how old were you during Thatchers reign?

Rooster Booster wrote:Interestingly there have been a few occasions over here of late, where a person has punched someone in a fight, who has fallen, smashed their head on the pavement and died. Also, If someone went out to just give someone a little "slap" as a warning without any intention other than to fire off a warning shot and they cracked their head and died. What happens then Petrocelli? Read all about it, in particular this bit: "Unlawful Act Manslaughter This is where the killing is the result of: the defendant's unlawful act (not omission); where the unlawful act is one which all sober and reasonable people would realise would subject the victim to the risk of some physical harm resulting there from, albeit not serious harm "

Rooster Booster wrote:Interestingly there have been a few occasions over here of late, where a person has punched someone in a fight, who has fallen, smashed their head on the pavement and died. Also, If someone went out to just give someone a little "slap" as a warning without any intention other than to fire off a warning shot and they cracked their head and died. What happens then Petrocelli? Read all about it, in particular this bit: "Unlawful Act Manslaughter This is where the killing is the result of: the defendant's unlawful act (not omission); where the unlawful act is one which all sober and reasonable people would realise would subject the victim to the risk of some physical harm resulting there from, albeit not serious harm "

What would your criteria be in deciding who are the worst murderers who are also the most obviously guilty?

For example, would you treat Ian Huntley different to Myra Hindley? He was convicted by an 11-1 majority verdict. Would that spare him the noose?

old enough to remember it, but what that has to do with anything is anyone's guess.