Durham Giant wrote:But that is your OPINION. some people find pranksters funny. Whether you find it funny or not is irrelevant it is a legitimate type of comedy.
I found it funny because it was so bad and so ridiculous that it took up the news for a whole day. It really parodies the press and makes them seem more ridiculous with their fawning over a celebrity and relegating important news off the telly and front pages.
Nope, don't see any of that. Just a childish, ill-conceived call. Methinks you're reading waaaaay to much to into it to suit your anti-royal agenda.
Quote:You also seem to find it difficult to separate what happened with what is going on in your head. They talked to two nurses. Not to Kate , not to the patient not to the foetus two nurses. Where you get all this crap about it being upsetting and distressing for the patient is ridiculous.
Of course, it helps if you actually read what you're replying to, the key phrase being what I actually wrote: "
potential for causing stress to the sick patient and their baby". We're all fully aware they didn't speak to Kate, doesn't change the fact they tried to.
Quote:That is going to be a lot less than than the shiite she will have to put up with from the press for the next 50 years because the press cater for people like you with wall to wall celebrity coverage.
There we go again, making things up. I utterly detest celebrity culture. That doesn't mean I can't see how despicable this 'prank' was.
Quote:Of course i feel sorry for the nurses caught in the middle of it but a quick i will hand you over to the management should solve the difficulty.
I would guess that when faced with a tricky or delicate situation at work all of us say i will pass you on to the manager, HR, Pr person or whatever
Not sure they would have been on duty at 4am or 5am. And I imagine they wouldn't expect people to be pranking hospitals in the early hours with the intention of disturbing a sick and pregnant patient. Only a complete tw@ would think that was a good idea. Or indeed, humorous.