does this now mean that the winners are officially Jan Ullrich (3 times) & co ?
Ullrich is also a proven cheat so is that whole T de F period one big farce ?
His titles would go to Ullrich (3 of them), Zulle, Basso, Kloden and Beloki. So that would be 3 proven drugs cheats and one shady one. Yeah The Tour is Dead, long live the Tour
Joined: Mar 28 2010 Posts: 5506 Location: Albi, France
onewild wrote:His titles would go to Ullrich (3 of them), Zulle, Basso, Kloden and Beloki. So that would be 3 proven drugs cheats and one shady one. Yeah The Tour is Dead, long live the Tour
then the whole process starts all over again......
does this now mean that the winners are officially Jan Ullrich (3 times) & co ?
Ullrich is also a proven cheat so is that whole T de F period one big farce ?
It does seem a tricky precedent to apply consistently.
Applying similar logic, surely they should retrospectively strip every East German athlete or swimmer of their Olympic titles? Where would it end?
A lifetime ban for Armstrong from now (if they've got the evidence) might not have any practical consequences but it would more than taint is career. Trying to re-write the records just seems to cause as many problems as it solves.
What a mess, so we could be seeing guys who didn't even finish on the podium in the "Armstrong years" being awarded Tour wins?...goes to show how widespread it was back then.
The thing is there has been rumours for years over him, has Armstrong's profile and charity work meant a cover up in the UCI?
Joined: Mar 28 2010 Posts: 5506 Location: Albi, France
Cibaman wrote:It does seem a tricky precedent to apply consistently.
Applying similar logic, surely they should retrospectively strip every East German athlete or swimmer of their Olympic titles? Where would it end?
A lifetime ban for Armstrong from now (if they've got the evidence) might not have any practical consequences but it would more than taint is career. Trying to re-write the records just seems to cause as many problems as it solves.
well, hopefully that's the end of the debacle and cycling can carry on building it's reputation despite all this ridiculous points scoring by the drugs agencies
regarding east german athletes - I don't think I would want to see many of the women 'stripped' as they would look more like men than erhh, men !
Joined: Feb 21 2002 Posts: 31779 Location: The commentary box
duke street 10 wrote:The thing is there has been rumours for years over him, has Armstrong's profile and charity work meant a cover up in the UCI?
Cycling News are running with the story that the reason he never failed a test was that he was tipped off in advance of the testers, suggesting an insider in the anti-doping agencies. Whether that involves the UCI or not, who knows, but it's pretty damning.
Joined: Mar 07 2004 Posts: 13327 Location: A Red Muffin on the outskirts of Pie Land
There's also the alledged payment of something like 200-400,000 us dollars that he paid to the uci that has been muted about. It's widely thought that this was some.kind of hush money. Which was used ironically to help purchase a new drug detection equipment.
spooneryork wrote::shock: There's more chance of Labour getting re-elected than Salfords new stadium ever getting built.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum