Post subject: Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut?
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:13 pm
Charlie Sheen
Player Coach
Joined: Nov 08 2005 Posts: 10530 Location: Leeds
A few of the lads I know have had to have it done for medical reasons and they say its one of the best things they've ever done, and would recommend every bloke has it done.
King Monkey wrote:Maybe a spell in prison would do Graham good.
Post subject: Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut?
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:22 pm
John_D
International Chairman
Joined: Feb 21 2002 Posts: 31779 Location: The commentary box
Charlie Sheen wrote:A few of the lads I know have had to have it done for medical reasons and they say its one of the best things they've ever done, and would recommend every bloke has it done.
Post subject: Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut?
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:24 pm
Cronus
Club Coach
Joined: Jan 30 2005 Posts: 7152 Location: one day closer to death
Keith wrote:The circumcised glans is being unfairly portrayed here as some insensitive lump of dry flesh. However, although it might have become de-sensitised to its everyday environment when unaroused, just the act of touching one shortly after its finished its business an be enough to send its owner into all sorts of agonies. I therefore conclude that on the job it is just as good at sending pleasure signals to the brain as its uncircumcised counterpart. This isn't a post in support of circumcision by the way, after all we don't have the benefit of self sufficiency in cottage cheese.
Only after finishing its business? You're missing out. Standing to attention or not, the sensation to me is almost the same thanks to the foreskin protecting the nerve endings. If the foreskin is pulled back I can't walk anywhere, it's too sensitive.
I therefore conclude that I get much better blow-jobs than you.
Charlie Sheen wrote:A few of the lads I know have had to have it done for medical reasons and they say its one of the best things they've ever done, and would recommend every bloke has it done.
Post subject: Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut?
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:45 pm
Keith
International Board Member
Joined: Oct 02 2002 Posts: 1552
Cronus wrote:
Keith wrote:The circumcised glans is being unfairly portrayed here as some insensitive lump of dry flesh. However, although it might have become de-sensitised to its everyday environment when unaroused, just the act of touching one shortly after its finished its business an be enough to send its owner into all sorts of agonies. I therefore conclude that on the job it is just as good at sending pleasure signals to the brain as its uncircumcised counterpart. This isn't a post in support of circumcision by the way, after all we don't have the benefit of self sufficiency in cottage cheese.
Only after finishing its business? You're missing out. Standing to attention or not, the sensation to me is almost the same thanks to the foreskin protecting the nerve endings. If the foreskin is pulled back I can't walk anywhere, it's too sensitive.
I therefore conclude that I get much better blow-jobs than you.
Charlie Sheen wrote:A few of the lads I know have had to have it done for medical reasons and they say its one of the best things they've ever done, and would recommend every bloke has it done.
Why?
I think you misunderstood me slightly. The thrust of my point was that the after-ejaculation sensitivity proves the nerve endings are still there so work just as well during and post arousal, they just don't trouble themselves with trivial things like touching cloth.
And as for better blow jobs, I'm in my late forties and been married for 20 years - for your sake I feckin hope you do
Post subject: Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut?
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:52 pm
Sandro II Terrorista
Player Coach
Joined: Jan 15 2007 Posts: 11924 Location: Secret Hill Top Lair. V.2
You're all doing these double entendres on purpose. Right?
I mean, Keith even mentioned "touching cloth" in his last post...
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.
Post subject: Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut?
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:44 pm
cod'ead
International Chairman
Joined: May 25 2002 Posts: 37704 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
Ha, who needs Mullas & Rabbis, when you can DIY with Accucirc
Caution there's a video on there, that ain't pretty watching
Ha, who needs Mullas & Rabbis, when you can DIY with Accucirc
Caution there's a video on there, that ain't pretty watching
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 122 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
