Joined: Jan 23 2006 Posts: 15980 Location: Boulevard with my balls of steel!
Kosh wrote:Not according to numerous threads on the Bulls board they aren't.
The only way they can put the game on at the weekend is if the majority of the staff they've just sacked agree to come back for free. And they have been asked. It's not clear how many have agreed though.
Perhaps I was giving the Administrators far too much credit then. If they've done that without plans in place to fulfill an upcoming fixture and possible source of income they should be answering some serious questions.
Joined: Jan 23 2006 Posts: 15980 Location: Boulevard with my balls of steel!
If he has signed then we've got this one badly wrong. Apart from him being a complete tool he's also absolute gash! What value would he bring to the team/squad?
Joined: Aug 01 2005 Posts: 5903 Location: Definately not in the Cuddle Crew
What actually wrong with Mcgoldwick, granted hes nothing special but he aint no anti-christ like some are making out. Apart from that though why do we actually need him, isnt he a back?
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12646 Location: Leicestershire.
Robbo4 wrote:Perhaps I was giving the Administrators far too much credit then. If they've done that without plans in place to fulfill an upcoming fixture and possible source of income they should be answering some serious questions.
In some ways it's a big game of chicken.
The RFL, HMRC, potential investors - none of them want the Bulls to go into liquidation, but they have to act like they're willing to. First one to blink picks up the tab, as 'bridging funding', accepting so many pennies per pound owed or getting lumbered with historic debt, respectively. But if none of them blink, they all lose; a club, even the pennies/pound or something to invest in.
I suspect the administrator is trying to force hand(s). And tbf you can see why.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Joined: Aug 27 2008 Posts: 2255 Location: Always to the left!
Sebasteeno wrote:What actually wrong with Mcgoldwick, granted hes nothing special but he aint no anti-christ like some are making out. Apart from that though why do we actually need him, isnt he a back?
Cover, i guess...
Ellis has gone Russell is a bit rubbish
So we've really only got Horne, Seymour and Nicklas as HB/FB for the rest of the season
EL CAMO wrote:The majority of fans at Craven Park...are idiots who know nothing about the game.
Offy wrote:you'd give up on the rest of the squad for the sake of one guy??? please.........
I didn't buy a season pass this year anyway because of work and have missed a few games already so McGoldrick signing would pretty much make me lose interest in all but the biggest games. Not only is he a thug and an idiot but he is a god awful player. I know it would only be a stop gap but if you're losing the likes of Moa and Tickle through injury and bringing in the likes of him we may aswell give Salford our playoff spot and be done with it.
That said I very much doubt there is any truth in it anyway.
Joined: Jan 21 2010 Posts: 727 Location: Hull...West Side
Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:I didn't buy a season pass this year anyway because of work and have missed a few games already so McGoldrick signing would pretty much make me lose interest in all but the biggest games. Not only is he a thug and an idiot but he is a god awful player. I know it would only be a stop gap but if you're losing the likes of Moa and Tickle through injury and bringing in the likes of him we may aswell give Salford our playoff spot and be done with it.
That said I very much doubt there is any truth in it anyway.
i hope to lucifer it aint true. poor player and generally not nice person
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
