wigan_rlfc wrote:It only works one way with Republicans, just think of the stink they still kick up about Loughgall.

rumpelstiltskin wrote:I love reading Durham Giant's nonsense. Whenever I feel a twinge of guilt about the behaviour of some individuals in the British Army, as soon as I get to the end of his first paragraph, all doubts are gone.

Here we have a guy born and brought up in England, and about as Irish as my last bowel movement, happily regurgitating a mixture of cut and pasted Wiki extracts and Republican nonsense as told to him by his inebriated Dad on a Friday night.

Then I remember, is this the same Durham Giant who was lead up the garden path a couple of seasons ago on the Virtual terrace page, when he fell hook line and sinker for the Classic Bailey thread?

I believe it is!

rumpelstiltskin wrote:I love reading Durham Giant's nonsense. Whenever I feel a twinge of guilt about the behaviour of some individuals in the British Army, as soon as I get to the end of his first paragraph, all doubts are gone.

Here we have a guy born and brought up in England, and about as Irish as my last bowel movement, happily regurgitating a mixture of cut and pasted Wiki extracts and Republican nonsense as told to him by his inebriated Dad on a Friday night.

Then I remember, is this the same Durham Giant who was lead up the garden path a couple of seasons ago on the Virtual terrace page, when he fell hook line and sinker for the Classic Bailey thread?

I believe it is!

Durham Giant wrote:Yes it does.

It was a war . In a war targets are legitimate. It all depends on which side you are on.

Was Saddam Hussein a legitimate target, was Gaddafi a legitimate target

Quote:You saw Republicans as legitimate targets i saw their opponents as legitimate targets. simple. I supported Irish Freedom fighters, You supported British interests. In the same way i would support Palestinians, ANC, Tamil Tigers Iranian Fedayeen or the french resistance

And as for your rubbish about being trendy and right on, give your head a shake.

Quote:100 stitches in my face being stabbed twice and shot at suggests i was a bit more than trendy and right on.

Quote:Your just a Plastic limey who sound like a Sun editorial.

Quote:.

of course it is terrorism and what is the dictionary definition of terrorism
Terrorism refers to the use of violence for the purpose of achieving a political, religious, or ideological goal.

What is carpet bombing in vietnam, firebombing in Dresden or Cruise missiles on Bagdad Terrorism or war it is all the same. I have no problem with terrorism as i have said it all comes down to which side you are on. I would support the CTs in Malaya, the mau mau in kenya and the Republicans in Ireland.

You support the Brits and America in Iraq and Afghanistan. Therefore you are suppportng the killing of
innocent civillians all the time. Dont talked to me about a f+cked up moral compass. You are the hypocrite.





I made no differentiation about which acts of war or terrorism i sympathised with. I chose my side and in doing so i have to accept that some were legitimate and some were not. In war you have to accept the good with the bad. It is only the trendy and hip who try to differentiate.

I bet you supported Loughall but did not support Bloody sunday. That is the weasly position i would expect from you. If you support the troops yopu have no choice but to accepth the good and the bad. Whether that is Saddam Hussein or Baba Mousa.





Get back to reading the SUN. And the fact that you keeping quoting 3 Lions out of context suggests you did not understand what the film was about


.

Durham Giant wrote:of course it is terrorism and what is the dictionary definition of terrorism
Terrorism refers to the use of violence for the purpose of achieving a political, religious, or ideological goal.

What is carpet bombing in vietnam, firebombing in Dresden or Cruise missiles on Bagdad Terrorism or war it is all the same. I have no problem with terrorism as i have said it all comes down to which side you are on. I would support the CTs in Malaya, the mau mau in kenya and the Republicans in Ireland.

You support the Brits and America in Iraq and Afghanistan. Therefore you are suppportng the killing of
innocent civillians all the time. Dont talked to me about a f+cked up moral compass. You are the hypocrite.

Quote:I made no differentiation about which acts of war or terrorism i sympathised with. I chose my side and in doing so i have to accept that some were legitimate and some were not. In war you have to accept the good with the bad. It is only the trendy and hip who try to differentiate.

Quote:I bet you supported Loughall but did not support Bloody sunday. That is the weasly position i would expect from you. If you support the troops yopu have no choice but to accepth the good and the bad. Whether that is Saddam Hussein or Baba Mousa.

Quote:Get back to reading the son. And the fact that you keeping quoting 3 Lions out of context suggests you did not unbderstand what the film was about

Quote:I know exactly what the plastic bit means and i reckon that is what you are a real Limey whose biggest contribution to the British state is being a keyboard warrior . That is plastic. I would have lot more respect for you if you had actually put on a uniform and fired a gun. You would probably have peed your pants though. Plastic limey boy.

Quote:


Spreading fear and intimidation is also about weakening the enemies capabilities. It is the principle of modern warfare. You ahve heard of shock and Awe havent you. that is about spreading fear and intimidation. Was the bombing of Dresden designed to reduce Germany's military capabilities or was it to spread Fear and Intimidation to the whole of the German population.

In any war people regret the killing of innocent civillians. The IRA never celebrated killing Kids. They made mistakes strategically and practically and acknowlegded it. Unlike the British who have killed a million more kids than Irish Republicans ever had. Except to you they dont count because they were all wogs, mussies or fuzzie wuzzies.

.


i try understand them. That is where you fall down. You think a bit of condemnation will solve everything. Understanding why these things happen is more likely to lead to a solution to those problems.You again sound like a Sun editorial , criminal acts, mindless barbarism blah blah blah. Nothing intelligent just some ignoramnt emotional rant. Maybe you are a taxi driver and just think based on blind prejudices. Maybe you are too stupid to have a moral compass


.

No i accept that in any war some acts are more regrettable than others but i have to accept that if you choose a side in a war or in a conflict actions will happen which impact on the innocent. You cannot pick and choose which ones you feel comforatble with.

If you support the troops in Iraq and the war in Iraq then you have to accept some reponsibility for the outcome in Iraq. You cannot say i like the removal of Hussein, i support the killing of his troops i support the giving of power to the Shias and then say, ooh i dont like the killing of the civillians today, or i dont like those radical shias i only like the nice friendly ones. You choose your side and have to accept the good and the bad. That is not confused that is accepting responsibility.
Except you are too weasley to accept that. What do you do read the paers and the military briefings and then decide which bits you are hapy with and which bits you are not

ion.

But was it a Law and order issue in which case shoot to kill without warnings was illegal or was it just a spectacularly successful military engagement. No complaints from me or the Republican movement just pointing out the inconsistency in British propaganda. Would you accept that warrenpoint was a well executed operation to destroy a para company.

.

Whereas you just believe British propaganda.



Are these the daft ones who were based on the 7/11 bombers. Yes you really did not understand that film at all.


.

Rooster Booster wrote:Can someone tell me what a plastic limey is please?

Thanks in advance.