Joined: May 25 2002 Posts: 37704 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
Big Graeme wrote:1. The bitter is John Smiths. 2. Heineken has not been the Anglicised version for around 5 years, every drop on sale here is the real thing.
Good news on the Heineken front, if they had any sense at all, they'd be letting people know about it, I've avoided it for years because of the difference.
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
Joined: Mar 08 2002 Posts: 26578 Location: On the set of NEDS...
cod'ead wrote:Good news on the Heineken front, if they had any sense at all, they'd be letting people know about it, I've avoided it for years because of the difference.
They did at the time mate, that is why you can only get the little barrel cans in the supermarkets and the price in the bars went up, it is now around 5%.
Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 7155 Location: Sydney 2000
If it was anything like Sydney.
Things will be more expensive in London than they are already and then people will leave the inflated Olympic prices in place, making it more expensive than you're used to.
Joined: May 25 2006 Posts: 8893 Location: Garth's Darkplace.
So this is it then. We've found a way to moan about the Olympics. "It will cost 10 times as much as planned", "It'll all be a building site cos we're crap at everything in this country" balh, blah, blah. It hasn't and it isn't. But we're British, there's nothing we can't f*****g complain about.
I'm looking forward to it, I think it's a fantastic event and I still think it's about human beings, just for a small moment, getting on and enjoying each others company and having a great time. All of the people competing (wether on big money or not, Olympics or Para Olymics) have dedicated their lives to achieving something in ways most of us could never do and I applaud that.
I don't care about the advertising.
"Well, I think in Rugby League if you head butt someone there's normally some repercusions"
Last time I checked you didn't have the liberty of infringing a trademark.
Sadly they way trademark protection works is you have to chase anyone infringing, if you don't you stand to lose any protection you have, that means chasing the small business as well as the big counterfeiting operations.
Mintball wrote:I knew there'd be a benefit for everyone somewhere.
Last time I checked you didn't have the liberty of infringing a trademark.
Sadly they way trademark protection works is you have to chase anyone infringing, if you don't you stand to lose any protection you have, that means chasing the small business as well as the big counterfeiting operations.
Joined: May 10 2002 Posts: 47951 Location: Die Metropole
Big Graeme wrote:Last time I checked you didn't have the liberty of infringing a trademark.
Sadly they way trademark protection works is you have to chase anyone infringing, if you don't you stand to lose any protection you have, that means chasing the small business as well as the big counterfeiting operations.
It's hardly just about protecting trademarks from infringement, is it?
These laws will allow entirely different names, logos, brands, adverts etc to be removed.
And given the way in which anti-terrorism laws have been used in recent years, how much faith do you really have that such laws would not be used to stop anti-Games sentiments? After all, one Twitter account has already been removed because of objections from Logoc.
We already have the total stupidity of such things as roadsigns near Coventry City's ground having to be changed so that they don't read 'Ricoh Stadium' because – oh my god, what damage that would do to other corporate bodies, while people are bustling around putting tape over brand names on hand driers in public toilets and elsewhere.
We have (or will have) anti-aircraft guns stationed on the top of people's homes.
We have people being told they can't open their workplaces because it would represent "unnecessary traffic", on roads where entire lanes have been designated as for use by VIPs only, with ordinary people told that they can't use certain road crossings either.
It's pathetic.
"You are working for Satan." Kirkstaller
"Dare to know!" Immanuel Kant
"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive" Elbert Hubbard
"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." Oscar Wilde
Joined: Mar 08 2002 Posts: 26578 Location: On the set of NEDS...
Mintball wrote:It's hardly just about protecting trademarks from infringement, is it?
These laws will allow entirely different names, logos etc to be removed.
The article you linked to dealt with trademark infringement and protecting those who have paid a small fortune to sponsor the event from having their efforts hijacked by those who have contributed zip.
Many of the powers set out in the bill are powers that various authorities have in other aspects of counterfeiting, the bill just allows then to act quicker.
The other lunacy is just that lunacy. Mind we still don't know how they are preventing people opening their workshops, there is nothing in the bill that gives anyone any powers to do that.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 85 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum