Post subject: Re: Tweeters and bloggers beware - over the top justice or w
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:52 pm
The Video Ref
Club Owner
Joined: Feb 29 2004 Posts: 4195
Rock God X wrote:My views are that he's a racist shlthead, but that he shouldn't be serving time for calling someone a name, however unpleasant that name is.
Yes, I agree. I think his sentence is totally excessive for a man of previous good character involved in a one-off offence. Should have got a police caution, at most.
Post subject: Re: Tweeters and bloggers beware - over the top justice or w
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:20 am
Cragganmore Kid
Club Coach
Joined: Feb 16 2005 Posts: 2794 Location: Back In Black
The Video Ref wrote:Yes, I agree. I think his sentence is totally excessive for a man of previous good character involved in a one-off offence. Should have got a police caution, at most.
Reading the feed, I'd dispute he was ever of 'good character'... what a horrible little scrote.
Post subject: Re: Tweeters and bloggers beware - over the top justice or w
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:50 pm
tb
In The Arms of 13 Angels
Joined: Mar 05 2002 Posts: 48326 Location: Londinium
Is this the time to point out that - pace Sunny Hundal, Carter Magna, the twittersphere and assorted bloggerati - he's not been charged, tried, convicted or sentenced for swearing or for calling someone a rude name?
Quote:Finally, turning to the cries of assaults upon freedom of expression, it has to be remembered freedom of expression is a qualified right. The higher courts have already considered the balancing of freedom of expression with section 127, and came to this conclusion:
‘Section 127(1)(a) does of course interfere with a person’s right to freedom of expression. But it is a restriction clearly prescribed by statute. It is directed to a legitimate objective, preventing the use of a public electronic communications network for attacking the reputations and rights of others. It goes no further than is necessary in a democratic society to achieve that end.’
Lord Bingham, DPP v Collins.
In summary, swearing on Twitter is not a crime. Frankly, only a c*nt would think so. But being menacing, or being grossly offensive? That is.
Is this the time to point out that - pace Sunny Hundal, Carter Magna, the twittersphere and assorted bloggerati - he's not been charged, tried, convicted or sentenced for swearing or for calling someone a rude name?
Quote:Finally, turning to the cries of assaults upon freedom of expression, it has to be remembered freedom of expression is a qualified right. The higher courts have already considered the balancing of freedom of expression with section 127, and came to this conclusion:
‘Section 127(1)(a) does of course interfere with a person’s right to freedom of expression. But it is a restriction clearly prescribed by statute. It is directed to a legitimate objective, preventing the use of a public electronic communications network for attacking the reputations and rights of others. It goes no further than is necessary in a democratic society to achieve that end.’
Lord Bingham, DPP v Collins.
In summary, swearing on Twitter is not a crime. Frankly, only a c*nt would think so. But being menacing, or being grossly offensive? That is.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 105 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
