What was the difference? I paid £22/23 for north stand, think thats what its been every year since SL. With the only difference been the £1 to charity which you didnt have a choice in paying.

The south stand has been discounted this year (to I think £19), Not keen on the idea myself, and can see why some people would be unhappy, that said, it could be argued that a few years of FC not getting the "discount" that was applied to every other team visting craven parks south(?) stand means sympathy is possibly in somewhat short supply among some people.

£19 in South Stand, same view.

Neil, 2 wrongs don't make a right, i didn't agree with Rovers doing it either, and look how many of your fans boycotted our game because of it.

Daft idea imo, I would feel embarrassed watching a KC derby in one of the CP bars, esp when the KC hasn't sold out since 2007.

Re £4 difference, so bloody what, if you're a fan you'll pay it.

Quite a few of us not fans then eh, I won't lose any sleep

You're not a fan unless you've been supporting since 1972, regardless of your age.

Apparently so.

One of my first games was 0-1 vs Barrow, surely that must count?

A catastrophe waiting to happen at the KC. Rovers will be lucky to have 1500 paying supporters turning up, FC having to pay full whack will in my opinion bring 5000 tops. With our non-paying season ticket holders the game on a monday with sky will do well to attract 6500 paying punters as against 2000 at CP. Its also the first week of the school holidays, take off the fee's for rent and stewards the extra profit if any will be overshadowed by giving away home advantage.

Hudgell started this differential pricing lark in the city to shaft the FC fans, the whole thing's a monster of his own making.