Joined: Feb 17 2002 Posts: 28357 Location: MACS0647-JD
Although come to thing of it didn't the franchise embarrassingly lose a case against someone making Trooper helmets, as it was deemed not to be a work of art in which any form of copyright could subsist?
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total
AT THE RIPPINGHAM GALLERY .................................................................... ART PROFILE ................................................................... On Twitter ................................................................... On Facebook ...................................................................
Joined: Feb 17 2002 Posts: 28357 Location: MACS0647-JD
McLaren_Field wrote:They are suggesting that the pub owner contacts them to arrange a licensing deal.
Which is exactly what you'd expect being a copyright holder, hardly "backing down"
Backing down is 100% what it is.
Prior to this rather than suggesting anything, they'd had a cease and desist letter from high powered lawyers. Not an offer to carry on as normal for $100
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:Backing down is 100% what it is.
Prior to this rather than suggesting anything, they'd had a cease and desist letter from high powered lawyers. Not an offer to carry on as normal for $100
They've invited them to talk about a licensing deal, nothing more.
AT THE RIPPINGHAM GALLERY .................................................................... ART PROFILE ................................................................... On Twitter ................................................................... On Facebook ...................................................................
Joined: Oct 19 2003 Posts: 17898 Location: Packed like sardines, in a tin
McLaren_Field wrote:They are suggesting that the pub owner contacts them to arrange a licensing deal
the kind of thing I had in mind in my first post on the thread. Why go the legal route when a phone call or visit might have led to this outcome anyway?
Chris28 wrote:the kind of thing I had in mind in my first post on the thread. Why go the legal route when a phone call or visit might have led to this outcome anyway?
Sometimes you have to get people to come to the table before you can speak to them.
Quote:Mr Zaentz told the BBC that trademark law dictated they had to act against infringements of their brands.
"Regardless of the size of the company, if we didn't go after these infringements, then other people would say 'if they can use them without authorisation, why can't we?'
"When it's an established business, we like to get the company to acknowledge they are using our trademarks, stop selling infringing articles and then we will grant them a licence for a nominal fee - approximately $100 a year.
"We asked to them to contact us and amicably resolve this and are open to any suggestions they have.
Acknowledge that they are using our trademarks Stop selling infringing articles Then we will grant them a licence
Open to any suggestions they have - presumably in line with their expectations of acknowledgment, stopping infringements and then paying...
AT THE RIPPINGHAM GALLERY .................................................................... ART PROFILE ................................................................... On Twitter ................................................................... On Facebook ...................................................................
Joined: May 25 2002 Posts: 37704 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
McLaren_Field wrote:Sometimes you have to get people to come to the table before you can speak to them.
Acknowledge that they are using our trademarks Stop selling infringing articles Then we will grant them a licence
Open to any suggestions they have - presumably in line with their expectations of acknowledgment, stopping infringements and then paying...
So why hasn't Dairy Queen sued Liz for breaching their trademark?
The whole Hobbit thing is simply corporate phishing
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
Last edited by cod'ead on Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 102 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
