Graham Richards wrote:Briscoe would be a big loss to us. Equally i suspect if there is little improvement in the squads performances once we get to half way point of this season he will be off come November. Can't see the point in retaining someone who doesn't want to be here.
I will also add that those questioning his talent at this stage of his career need to asses all factors. A winger invariably is very reliant on his centre partner. imo in Tom's case he is screaming out for a quality centre to take him to the next level. He won't do that with his current partner. Harsh for some Hull fans to accept but i maintain that opinion.

Superbowl Scott wrote:He doesn't need to "pimp" out to the NRL theres enough interest after last season and the internationals.

dum-dum wrote:Wonder why he appointed Riolo and went rambling around Oz, sightseeing?

Briscoe was missing in the internationals, hardly noticed him.

Dave K. wrote:Didn't notice any Rovers players, doubt I will at the end of the season either.

dum-dum wrote:What's your point?

Dave K. wrote:Rovers players aren't good enough for England, Briscoe is.

Funny the biggest troll renowned for posting rubbish here and the Rovers forum asking me what my point is. I could ask that nearly every time you post.

dum-dum wrote:I was on topic, friend. Maybe you should question your own posts more often.

We don't have any English players, at Rovers, all Aussies innit.

tommyfromhull wrote:Why another winger with BJB and Hall on the books?

sgtwilko wrote:Briscoe has plenty to prove. He's done very little. No medals domestically, not won anything with England, not been top try scorer in the comp, Plays for an 'also ran' club. you are deluded. Great talent is briscoe but has plenty to do. At this moment in time he would get schooled by most of those wingers you write off! I'm off to watch 4 of em right now then watch the another 3 after the wests match.

you are also one of those who thinks Flanders is better than sinfield. Thats a joke in it's self.