Joined: Jan 30 2005 Posts: 7152 Location: one day closer to death
Mintball wrote:Oh, I'd entirely agree – it's essentially how the fashion world works.
I think the obviousness of this is what makes it stand out.
Absolutely, that's less of an 'influence' than daylight robbery. Almost perfect copies.
Good lawyers or not, hard to see how Claire's can get away with it.
That said, my friend has always said it practically impossible to start out as a designer these days for the simple fact the large fashion firms will 'borrow' anything decent and churn out their own versions - with just enough differences to probably be legally sound.
Joined: Feb 17 2002 Posts: 28357 Location: MACS0647-JD
One huge growth industry is the specialist mega lawyers for mega corporations. Basically and as noted above, the general idea is to sue, sue and sue, and kill your opponent off or bludgeon them into submission - however ludicrous your own case - or force them to back down for fear of humungous legal costs.
Where the battle is relatively less unequal, then the trick is to litigate as a device to harm a competitor's product or their ability to market it.
Good examples are the endless court forays all over the world between Apple and other manufacturers of phones and comms devices, where everything - even the basic oblong shape of a tablet - is either patented or copyrighted or trademarked and thousands of allegations of intellectual rights infringement are made all the time.
When you are up against a multi-million pound lawyer budget, very few can compete, and even if they try to take them on, a heavy lawsuit can take over your life and totally distract you from your business to the point you can't do both.
James Dyson was one such, he eventually succeeded (though regular patent skirmishes continue unabated) but only because he had some very substantial financial backing.
Anheuser-Busch is another example, they have spent millions and decades worldwide trying to kill off or strangle the Budvar brewery which produces a magnificent beer called Budweiser, but A-B want the Budweiser name all to themselves for their risibly-monikered "king of beers".
It's just commercial tactics. Truth and justice don't enter into it.
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:One huge growth industry is the specialist mega lawyers for mega corporations. Basically and as noted above, the general idea is to sue, sue and sue, and kill your opponent off or bludgeon them into submission - however ludicrous your own case - or force them to back down for fear of humungous legal costs.
Where the battle is relatively less unequal, then the trick is to litigate as a device to harm a competitor's product or their ability to market it.
Good examples are the endless court forays all over the world between Apple and other manufacturers of phones and comms devices, where everything - even the basic oblong shape of a tablet - is either patented or copyrighted or trademarked and thousands of allegations of intellectual rights infringement are made all the time.
When you are up against a multi-million pound lawyer budget, very few can compete, and even if they try to take them on, a heavy lawsuit can take over your life and totally distract you from your business to the point you can't do both.
James Dyson was one such, he eventually succeeded (though regular patent skirmishes continue unabated) but only because he had some very substantial financial backing.
Anheuser-Busch is another example, they have spent millions and decades worldwide trying to kill off or strangle the Budvar brewery which produces a magnificent beer called Budweiser, but A-B want the Budweiser name all to themselves for their risibly-monikered "king of beers".
It's just commercial tactics. Truth and justice don't enter into it.
Yup, this is something that needs legislation to stop it. The major electronics firms you mention are now acquiring companies purely for their 'patent portfolio' with the idea that rather than make money by selling to consumers, they will make it through suing other corporations for mega money..
Joined: Jun 05 2009 Posts: 5463 Location: Trapped in time. Surrounded by evil. Low on gas.
In 1972 Audemars Piguet released the Royal Oak.
At the same time Bulova released a near identical watch.
Now what's debatable is how the Bulova version came to be. Some state that Gerald Genta, the designer of the Royal Oak and many a famous watch, from Patek Philippes Nautilus to IWC's Ingenieur. Designed the watch for Bulova before soon moving onto Audemars Piguet where he again offered up the same design. The fact that the two version's more or less simultaneously hit stores at the same times, only served to muddy the waters further.
The other more widely acknowledged version of events, is that Bulova blatantly copied the Royal Oak design, at a time when the Swiss watch industry was on it's knee's due to the so called "quartz crisis". The Royal Oak is after all credited with saving AP from certain closure.
Ultimately the Bulova version was only made for a very short time before production was halted, no doubt due to pressure from AP. Suggesting that the latter version of event's turned out to be the truth. But the fact that Genta refused to speak on the matter, ultimately taking whatever he new to the grave with him, has never the less left a rather intriguing story behind.
On a side note. There is such a thing known as "homage" watches. Often copying the design of the most sought after pieces. With vintage Panerai being a prime target of this.
An original piece coming up for sale on the 12th of May in Mannheim
Yet because it features no name on the dial as per the original, is why Panerai's are perfectly suited to be "homaged". With those responsible totally free from prosecution.
I've not mentioned fakes at all, as that's all they are, fakes! Where as the above blur the lines to some degree.
In 1972 Audemars Piguet released the Royal Oak.
At the same time Bulova released a near identical watch.
Now what's debatable is how the Bulova version came to be. Some state that Gerald Genta, the designer of the Royal Oak and many a famous watch, from Patek Philippes Nautilus to IWC's Ingenieur. Designed the watch for Bulova before soon moving onto Audemars Piguet where he again offered up the same design. The fact that the two version's more or less simultaneously hit stores at the same times, only served to muddy the waters further.
The other more widely acknowledged version of events, is that Bulova blatantly copied the Royal Oak design, at a time when the Swiss watch industry was on it's knee's due to the so called "quartz crisis". The Royal Oak is after all credited with saving AP from certain closure.
Ultimately the Bulova version was only made for a very short time before production was halted, no doubt due to pressure from AP. Suggesting that the latter version of event's turned out to be the truth. But the fact that Genta refused to speak on the matter, ultimately taking whatever he new to the grave with him, has never the less left a rather intriguing story behind.
On a side note. There is such a thing known as "homage" watches. Often copying the design of the most sought after pieces. With vintage Panerai being a prime target of this.
An original piece coming up for sale on the 12th of May in Mannheim
Yet because it features no name on the dial as per the original, is why Panerai's are perfectly suited to be "homaged". With those responsible totally free from prosecution.
I've not mentioned fakes at all, as that's all they are, fakes! Where as the above blur the lines to some degree.
Wigan vs Leeds finals aggregate score.
Wigan 178 - 64 Leeds
Wigan wins - 6 Leeds wins - 0
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass, and I am all out of bubblegum.
Don't you struggle. Don't you fight. Don't you worry, cause it's your turn tonight!
Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
Wnidyone2012 wrote:Do people buy that crap??
You beat me to it, what a load of rubbish people buy.
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
Joined: May 25 2006 Posts: 8893 Location: Garth's Darkplace.
I thought fashion had nothing to do with what stuff looked like but what label was on it? As long as it says Stella McCartney somewhere you could be dangling a turd around your neck.
"Well, I think in Rugby League if you head butt someone there's normally some repercusions"
Joined: Apr 03 2003 Posts: 28186 Location: A world of my own ...
DHM wrote:I thought fashion had nothing to do with what stuff looked like but what label was on it? As long as it says Stella McCartney somewhere you could be dangling a turd around your neck.
It's not a turd, it's a vintage, pre-used food item.
"As you travel through life don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things" - George Carlin
DHM wrote:I thought fashion had nothing to do with what stuff looked like but what label was on it? As long as it says Stella McCartney somewhere you could be dangling a turd around your neck.
Poppycock. You obviously haven't seen this. Bet you feel daft for disparaging the fashion industry now, eh?
DHM wrote:I thought fashion had nothing to do with what stuff looked like but what label was on it? As long as it says Stella McCartney somewhere you could be dangling a turd around your neck.
Poppycock. You obviously haven't seen this. Bet you feel daft for disparaging the fashion industry now, eh?
Christianity: because you're so awful you made God kill himself.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
