The Yellow Giraffe wrote:I agree mate, every team, Saints included ,have their fair share of biased individuals. I just felt that the reaction from your fans at the end was incredibly uncalled for.
I don't think anyone was calling Saints cheats, but Thaler isn't a favorite at Craven Park.
Joined: Jun 12 2003 Posts: 4022 Location: Kingston Upon Hull (East)
I'd hazard a guess that we were so close to beating a full strength Saints team with an injury ravaged side in what was a highly entertaining game that it was frustrating to see Saints in possession and doing their usual last gasp desperation breakaway thing. It was a high shot nobody can deny that especially after seeing it on Sky! What we can ask for clarification on is why Saints got possession. Webster didn't knock on it clearly went backwards and then forwards off your player before being gathered by Lovegrove. That I think is where the initial frustrations came from. Not forgetting your first try was dubious and could easily have been a knock on decision, will admit though hard to call at the spare of the moment.
Joined: Mar 22 2009 Posts: 2397 Location: East Hull
Not only was saints 1st try a possible knock on it was forward for the last pass- skys just made the knock on or not still a 50/50 call. But deffo looked forward on sky.
Didnt really see the high shot but again after seeing it on sky id say it was high- but ive also had saints friends who said thaler was our man of the match so people in glass houses n all that.
[quote="Adeybull"] so the panel took the same view as your excellent assessment.[/quote]
Joined: Jul 22 2008 Posts: 16170 Location: Somewhere other than here
dum-dum wrote:Poor, I enjoyed winding up the Saints fans walking to the car, unhappy with just one point, your fans arrived expecting to win, glad we gave you a game.
That would be a joke, yes? We haven't won at Craven Park since 2007 in the league. Why then would Saints fans be anticipating a win there now? I know me and all around me were anticipating a loss and couldn't believe it when we went 14-0 up.
Success is not final; failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. (Winston Churchill)
After watching it back on sky, yes the shot was high. However, like Nick says, it was the decision making in the run up to that which was suspect. As for your generic view of our supporters
SaintsFan wrote:That would be a joke, yes? We haven't won at Craven Park since 2007 in the league. Why then would Saints fans be anticipating a win there now? I know me and all around me were anticipating a loss and couldn't believe it when we went 14-0 up.
Really? We have three of our most influential players out; two being half backs and one our captain, and you really didn't even anticipate a win at all? Find that hard to believe myself.
Joined: Sep 18 2010 Posts: 4623 Location: Easter Island
SaintsFan wrote:That would be a joke, yes? We haven't won at Craven Park since 2007 in the league. Why then would Saints fans be anticipating a win there now? I know me and all around me were anticipating a loss and couldn't believe it when we went 14-0 up.
Yet chose to discuss the 5 games following Hull KR, like it was a given.
Michelangelo, 1475-1564. ---------- Every block of stone has a statue inside it and it is the task of the sculptor to discover it. ----------
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
