a massive no from me, the kc is a football stadium and nothing else. it lacks atmosphere when hosting rugby matches. i prefer to stand, perfect rl ground for me is warrington, however, i have not yet been to salford or saints new stadia.

the pitch is absolutely shocking due to the ammount of time already played on it currently, i can't see adding another team possible. are there any other grounds which have 3 pro teams playing on its surface?

They have one and they may use it but if they did use the reason you stated they would be rather hypocritical.

Tim Whatshisface was only Lloyd's puppet anyway.

Anyone who wouldn't travel a couple of miles to the KC to support their club is pathetic and deserves crossland and hudgell to stick 2 fingers up at them and walk away

Well you did it, Craven Park to KC, didn't you?

Conjures up quite an image.

For a change in the number of tenants, both existing tenants would have to agree. So, yes, Hull FC would have power of veto.

No body in any form of decision making capacity is still in charge of Hull FC that were in office when Barry Lilley tried to shaft Hull FC.

I doubt Pearson would factor it into any decision.

do we want to play at the kc in one word no if they did a poll at rovers ground it would be no no no 8000 times no

Can't argue with you regarding standing, but in your opinion what constitutes a football stadium as opposed to a rugby stadium.

The atmosphere at craven park is pants for 80%. Of the attendees.

I can conclude from your last comment regarding the pitch, that you haven't been to the kc for a long time.

Maybe so but Nick Barmby certainly has and he has layed into the ground staff more that once infact he did so only 2 weeks ago.