Ferocious Aardvark wrote:Except I'm not certain that this would quite count as using objective selection criteria.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1e72/b1e729565ed2accd1b8b8e358cebee1b00d91b36" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Sounds like a cop-out. Would be funny listening to them trying to persuade a tribunal that the procedure was fair and reasonable! Still, if it is really true that the pool all 100% agree this, then get on with it, as (obviously) there is zero risk of a tribunal claim being brought by an unlucky worker.
Yeah, right! I'd deffo take that risk if I was the employer!!
However, if it is true that the pool all agree on it, there IS a way to do it, outside the workplace, by the pool of workers themselves.
The employer selects nobody. They ask for 10 VOLUNTEERS for redundancy. The pool then go away somewhere quiet and draw lots, as a purely personal thing, and the "winners" go and volunteer for redundancy. Job done. The employer neither knows, nor cares, why they got the 10 volunteers they wanted, and everyone is seemingly happy.
I don't doubt that 'legally' there is an issue, I just think from a practical point its fair. Anyway, I believe Edinburgh council have had a 're-think'