We've already got that. What the problem is, is that when they put him on trial again, the evidence they will use against him will have come from abusing the rights of other (i.e. torturing them).

He is a despicable individual, but I wonder if keeping him in a maximum security nick as long as we can would be better than deporting him anyway, at least if we have him under control he can't foment discontent and terrorist actions by others.

Mintball wrote:He's in the nick, as far as I'm aware – Long Lartin, I think someone mentioned earlier, to correct the view that it was Belmarsh. I'm not aware that he's getting out of there anytime soon. But then I haven't been following the case in great detail. I haven't, but I thought I'd read somewhere that he was under a form of house arrest under terror legislation, but without actually having been convicted. Having looked into it further, it seems that he's in detention, but house arrest is the likely outcome if and when he has to be released from detention: Here.

Mintball wrote:He's in the nick, as far as I'm aware – Long Lartin, I think someone mentioned earlier, to correct the view that it was Belmarsh. I'm not aware that he's getting out of there anytime soon. But then I haven't been following the case in great detail. I haven't, but I thought I'd read somewhere that he was under a form of house arrest under terror legislation, but without actually having been convicted. Having looked into it further, it seems that he's in detention, but house arrest is the likely outcome if and when he has to be released from detention: Here.

you are Quite correct Mintball he is in Long Lartin.