Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
Standee wrote:surely the manufacturer is at fault?
Might be wrong, but I thought the supplier to the end user was responsible, it was then up to them to take the matter up with the manufacturer.
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
rover49 wrote:Might be wrong, but I thought the supplier to the end user was responsible, it was then up to them to take the matter up with the manufacturer.
oh I agree, I mean the final responsibility is with the manufacturer.
I just don't think the NHS should pay for it, as someone else has said, they don't cover dental work etc.
EHW wrote:however, this is not a routine situation - ultimately, the women with these implants have a higher risk of breast cancer, and the NHS will be liable to treat that. It will probably be worth taking the risk of paying now to avoid a bigger cost in a few years.
Not sure about the risk of cancer tbh, however the NHS will certainly foot the bill for the stress and anxiety caused to a large majority of these women thanks to the media doing what they enjoy doing, whipping up hysteria!
Joined: Jun 06 2010 Posts: 1585 Location: on the naughty step
If there are any ladies out there that want their breasts looking at then I am available to carry out such checks free of charge and willing to travel to do so . I have no medical qualifications , but I do know a good pair when I see them .
Joined: Feb 17 2002 Posts: 28357 Location: MACS0647-JD
cod'ead wrote:You wanted to know how worried I would be, not how worried you or your missus would be. And as I stated I ain't worried because the person that I live with, who actually has implants, isn't worried
I really didn't. I find it pretentious to use the term "one" a la Prince Charles, but that's obviously what I meant. The reason I could not have been asking how worried YOU PERSONALLY would be, is because you do not have breast implants, and therefore, in your case, worry don't enter into it..
Nor are you likely to ever need them, as you're making a big enough tit of yourself unaided.
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total
Joined: May 25 2002 Posts: 37704 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:I really didn't. I find it pretentious to use the term "one" a la Prince Charles, but that's obviously what I meant. The reason I could not have been asking how worried YOU PERSONALLY would be, is because you do not have breast implants, and therefore, in your case, worry don't enter into it..
Nor are you likely to ever need them, as you're making a big enough tit of yourself unaided.
Ever thought of using the term "anyone" instead of directly responding to a statement I made, using the term "you"?
Not that difficult for a man of learning surely
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
