Where would they be deported to?

Once again alcohol is used (wrongly) as a mitigating factor not and aggravating one.

According to the report, the judge accepted that it wasn't racially motivated.

Though, conversely, Allah is going to be well pissed off.

Then he, having heard ALL of the evidence must be believed.

Report says they are Somalians, so I'd presume Somalia.

If I could read a report with all the relevant facts in it, I'd express an opinion.
As it stands, I can't.

That's an odd one. Do judges never make mistakes? I'm not saying that the attack was racially motivated, and I accept that the judge had access to a lot more information than you or I, but to say the judge must be believed is just wrong. Perhaps if he had stated explicitly why he thought it wasn't (maybe he did and it wasn't reported), we could be a bit more confident either way.

Oh, and, I was only answering your question as to who said the attack wasn't racially motivated.

Out of curiosity, what was the reason for the attack?

They were offended by Christmas.