Horatio Yed wrote:A compulsory set amount of hours before you can apply for test with a tick off system that shows you've had a lesson in most weathers/conditions ie Bright Sunshine, rain, icy or snow conditions, night time driving, rush hour.
Not sure about this. Lets say you tell someone they have to have 40 hours. What happens if they are good enough after 30. People will moan about being ripped off.
So what happens if it doesnt snow. Would it people cant then drive in the snow?
Horatio Yed wrote:A longer test
I would agree with this. One hour long should be enough.
Horatio Yed wrote:Skid pan training
Good idea, but i bet it would be hard to set up.
Horatio Yed wrote:Compulsory motorway training
Fully agree with that.
---------------------------
Horatio Yed wrote:On passing your test draconian rules for the first 2 years
Not enough police to enforce it.
Horatio Yed wrote:No car over a 1.3L and fixed limit on BHP output (stops souped up 1.3 death traps) for 2 years.
I would not limit engine size, but would limit engine power.
Horatio Yed wrote:Blameworthy accidents in first 2 years means having to go for an assessment on your driving and possible license revocation if not satisfactory.
Agree with half of it. The driving assessment would not be a true reflection of how someone drives.
Horatio Yed wrote:Keep the 6 points rule.
Agree with that.
Horatio Yed wrote:Telemetric insurance.
Agree with that as well.
----------------------------------
Horatio Yed wrote:10 years after passing and every 10 years there after having to attend a one day driving class to bring up any new road rules etc and one day driving assessment only for the basis of ironing out faults and bad habits that may have crept in .
This should be every 5 years. And a full medical and eye sight test as well.
Now what about all those who have already passed and are driving like clowns?