And voluntary is how these kind of things should be done. Having read your opening post in this thread I do think that you’re doing something good and I only wished that we (me and the other pupils I went to school with) did more things like this at school. The only practical business experience during my education was running a games stall to raise money for the school during the Christmas and summer fairs. What you’re doing looks like an extension of that which is great.

I never directed what I originally wrote towards you personally otherwise I would have added that this looks like another one of those poverty pimp jobs. However what I should have done is gone onto to add that what you’re doing seems genuine. Hopefully I’ve amended any confusion they may have been before. Good luck with what you’re doing!

Now let me go and expand on an enterprise scheme that isn’t genuine and just a good way for mildly successful/unsuccessful businesspeople to line their pockets by exploiting an issue that the government throws a lot of money to try and solves. I’m talking about 'Enterprise Leeds' who have engaged with 4,000 people (thats not even including the 15,500 young people they claim to have introduced enterprise to) and only created 596 jobs. Now I think it’s great that they’ve got people into jobs and we must not trivialise that fact.

However these poverty Pimps and others like them have all thrived by exploiting the laws of probability that if they try to ‘help’ thousands of people into enterprise then some of the people that have been helped are bound to get success. But the majority don’t get success and it’s wrong that they still get the big funding for helping the minority that they do.

What I’m trying to say that this money from the government would be better used towards creating jobs for the unemployed rather than creating more work for those who already have it. For Example Enterprise Leeds clearly has done by paying business people to deliver the enterprise schemes for the young and disadvantage. Enterprise Leeds doesn’t have the right intentions and are the very essence of poverty pimps that wouldn’t give the poor their time of day if they weren’t getting paid by the government to do it.

And voluntary is how these kind of things should be done. Having read your opening post in this thread I do think that you’re doing something good and I only wished that we (me and the other pupils I went to school with) did more things like this at school. The only practical business experience during my education was running a games stall to raise money for the school during the Christmas and summer fairs. What you’re doing looks like an extension of that which is great.

I never directed what I originally wrote towards you personally otherwise I would have added that this looks like another one of those poverty pimp jobs. However what I should have done is gone onto to add that what you’re doing seems genuine. Hopefully I’ve amended any confusion they may have been before. Good luck with what you’re doing!

Now let me go and expand on an enterprise scheme that isn’t genuine and just a good way for mildly successful/unsuccessful businesspeople to line their pockets by exploiting an issue that the government throws a lot of money to try and solves. I’m talking about 'Enterprise Leeds' who have engaged with 4,000 people (thats not even including the 15,500 young people they claim to have introduced enterprise to) and only created 596 jobs. Now I think it’s great that they’ve got people into jobs and we must not trivialise that fact.

However these poverty Pimps and others like them have all thrived by exploiting the laws of probability that if they try to ‘help’ thousands of people into enterprise then some of the people that have been helped are bound to get success. But the majority don’t get success and it’s wrong that they still get the big funding for helping the minority that they do.

What I’m trying to say that this money from the government would be better used towards creating jobs for the unemployed rather than creating more work for those who already have it. For Example Enterprise Leeds clearly has done by paying business people to deliver the enterprise schemes for the young and disadvantage. Enterprise Leeds doesn’t have the right intentions and are the very essence of poverty pimps that wouldn’t give the poor their time of day if they weren’t getting paid by the government to do it.