Rooster Booster wrote:Because people believe the myth.
As fit as?
It could be, but very unlikely. More to do with things like tackle counts, missed tackles, metres made by the aussies in the game. How many in a tackle. etc. etc. Many, many variables. Aussies get on a roll, and we let our heads fall. Generally, fück all to do with fitness.
I hope so too. How often have you seen this bloke play then Jonesy, to pass such a comment on him?
I should add that the reason I say it's a myth is that I have spoken to several players who have played in both comps as well as a fitness conditioner friend who was in SL and have said there is no real difference in strength and conditioning. I can only go by what the players who actually experience it rather than us fans opinions on what we choose to believe.
The myth is a strong one then, the fans believe it, the Clubs in England believe it.
Who else is there to convince?
I said as least as fit as England I was being sarcastic, have you ever heard anyone say the England players are fitter than the Kangaroo's or the Kiwis and we will grind them down in the last quarter of the game?
I have never heard or seen any suggestion that if it came down to fitness or conditioning England/GB had the edge. I don't have a friend that knows these things. Which players did you talk too?
Fitness has lots to do with metres gained, tackles, fatigue, out of position etc.
Classic example in the final where Peacock was wandering around taking a breather as Gallen ran straight passed him for JT's try.
I have seen Graham play many times both at Test level and for Saints, I think he is a good player. We have TV's here nowadays and recorders, not to mention computers.
Its all good Rooster we all have our opinions.
Can I ask why you keep swearing in your posts?
Young kids frequent this forums I am told, the swear filter is there for that reason, you seem to be intentionally bypassing it.