inside_man wrote:Probably because they'd just lost a player to Union, it was an issue that needed dealing with anyway, and it's not special dispensation at all, it's applied to all clubs who have players that represent England at international level.
It is a special dispensation as Wigan had it shoehorned through to suit them at a time they wanted it. They wanted it, not to keep Tomkins, but to sign the 5 players they've subsequently signed. It's also a bit of a concern than none of Wigan's signings for next season are eligible for England.
Post subject: Re: Wigan abuse new cap rules already?
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:29 pm
Wandering Warrior
Player Coach
Joined: Mar 16 2010 Posts: 2513 Location: Tyldesley
We lost something like 6 players end of last season. Using that money on the cap for Sam Tomkins new deal means we would be 6 players down. We could of just said bye Sam go to union and then England would be a lot worse off.
The extra money that has been dispensated will all be going to Tomkins and the rest of the signings will fit under the cap as normal.
Post subject: Re: Wigan abuse new cap rules already?
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:30 pm
Wandering Warrior
Player Coach
Joined: Mar 16 2010 Posts: 2513 Location: Tyldesley
Saddened! wrote:It is a special dispensation as Wigan had it shoehorned through to suit them at a time they wanted it. They wanted it, not to keep Tomkins, but to sign the 5 players they've subsequently signed. It's also a bit of a concern than none of Wigan's signings for next season are eligible for England.
Post subject: Re: Wigan abuse new cap rules already?
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:36 pm
Offside Monkey
Player Coach
Joined: Jun 29 2005 Posts: 10399 Location: Awaiting a ban.
I hate to side with the old enemy, but Wigan have lost Jomkins, Hoffman, Deacon, Cross, Coley & Pryce from their playing roster.
Do you think that the signings of Dudson, Flower, a guy called Rhodri and some unemployed teenage kiwi who's never played first grade will be taking up as much salary as the guys that have left?
[url=www.cater-bake.co.uk]Cater-Bake UK - Pizza and Bakery Equipment Specialists[/url]
Post subject: Re: Wigan abuse new cap rules already?
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:03 pm
inside_man
Player Coach
Joined: Apr 20 2009 Posts: 3614
Saddened! wrote:It is a special dispensation as Wigan had it shoehorned through to suit them at a time they wanted it. They wanted it, not to keep Tomkins, but to sign the 5 players they've subsequently signed. It's also a bit of a concern than none of Wigan's signings for next season are eligible for England.
Out of interest Saddened, if you are now classing Welsh players as being overseas signings (basically), who did that Legendary player who retired recently and now has a statue at your new stadium play for? Is he home grown?
Post subject: Re: Wigan abuse new cap rules already?
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:03 pm
Wigg'n
International Star
Joined: May 11 2011 Posts: 7576
Offside Monkey wrote:I hate to side with the old enemy, but Wigan have lost Jomkins, Hoffman, Deacon, Cross, Coley & Pryce from their playing roster.
Do you think that the signings of Dudson, Flower, a guy called Rhodri and some unemployed teenage kiwi who's never played first grade will be taking up as much salary as the guys that have left?
Post subject: Re: Wigan abuse new cap rules already?
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:35 pm
Badwanger
Club Coach
Joined: Jan 10 2005 Posts: 1696
Offside Monkey wrote:I hate to side with the old enemy, but Wigan have lost Jomkins, Hoffman, Deacon, Cross, Coley & Pryce from their playing roster.
In which case they should have plenty of cap space to accommodate any increase in Tomkins salary.
Quote:Do you think that the signings of Dudson, Flower, a guy called Rhodri and some unemployed teenage kiwi who's never played first grade will be taking up as much salary as the guys that have left?
That's not the issue. The issue is that these were signed AFTER the dispensation was granted thus indicating that they did not need the special dispensation in the first place!
Deano G wrote:Come to think of it, that Saints side (1992/93) was a better side than the 2006 side and the 2009 side.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 59 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum