The Video Ref wrote:A brilliant article in The Independent today. It basically said that some in the public sector have completely unrealistic expectations. The make up around 1/5 of the workforce and are generally paid better than people with similar qualifications in the private sector.
Myth.
People working in the public sector simply want their local authority to honour the terms and conditions that were written into their contracts, hardly unrealistic.
King Monkey wrote:Maybe a spell in prison would do Graham good.
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 18060 Location: On the road
Big Graeme wrote:Oh the irony.
Translation - I didn't read it properly just jumped in but I am not big enough to admit it - so I'll try some diversion tactics!!
I am a mod after all!!
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
Last edited by Sal Paradise on Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 18060 Location: On the road
cod'ead wrote:I have no idea what you're on about now but if it makes you happy, my car gets regular breaks, it gets a good rest every night too.
You know exactly what I am talking about
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
Joined: May 10 2002 Posts: 47951 Location: Die Metropole
He has also still to acknowledge a single instance - and by god, it's a rapidly rising number - where he's posted utter rubbish because his knee-jerk exactions mean he can't read properly or he's just plain wrong.
"You are working for Satan." Kirkstaller
"Dare to know!" Immanuel Kant
"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive" Elbert Hubbard
"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." Oscar Wilde
Joined: Mar 05 2002 Posts: 48326 Location: Londinium
The Video Ref wrote:Very much the same thing is about to happen to the armed forces. Pensions will be based on career average rather than final salary. Unsurprisingly, no-one is planning to strike, partly because they are Crown servants and can't.
A brilliant article in The Independent today. It basically said that some in the public sector have completely unrealistic expectations. The make up around 1/5 of the workforce and are generally paid better than people with similar qualifications in the private sector.
If anybody really wrote that in the Indy, they deserve sacking for incompetence. Average salary across the public sector is higher than average salary across the private sector, true.
But …
this is because the private sector contains many jobs on minimum wage alone, the public sector doesn't; many low paid jobs (such as cleaning) have been moved from the public sector to the private sector, with obvious effects on the two averages; public services include a higher proportion of gruduate and professional-qualification jobs than the private sector.
But, if compare like for like (ie people with similar qualifications) private sector employment invariably pays more.
The Video Ref wrote:They get better terms and conditions and a pension that those in the private sector would have to pay around 37% of their salary to match. If we are all in this together, then so is the public sector.
Ah … I see what you've done: collective pension schemes are more cost effective than personal defined contribution pension plans, where a larger proportion of your money goes to the fund managers in fees and your pension is not paid by any pension scheme, but relies on buying an annuity at the time you retire - which is the more expensive option.
So you've compared apples and chair legs and are pretending you can draw some sort of valid conclusion.
Essentially, as with your OP, your talkng b*llks again.
Joined: May 25 2002 Posts: 37704 Location: Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
tb wrote:If anybody really wrote that in the Indy, they deserve sacking for incompetence.
It's Christina Patterson mate. As a former director of the Poetry Society, and literary programmer at London's Southbank Centre, surely she's ideally placed to give an insight into the public/private sector argument.
I must be honest, when I first read VR's post, I fully expected to find that the authur in question was Nigel's lad, Dominic Lawson.
tb wrote:If anybody really wrote that in the Indy, they deserve sacking for incompetence.
It's Christina Patterson mate. As a former director of the Poetry Society, and literary programmer at London's Southbank Centre, surely she's ideally placed to give an insight into the public/private sector argument.
I must be honest, when I first read VR's post, I fully expected to find that the authur in question was Nigel's lad, Dominic Lawson.
The older I get, the better I was
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
Joined: Mar 05 2002 Posts: 48326 Location: Londinium
cod'ead wrote:It's Christina Patterson mate. As a former director of the Poetry Society, and literary programmer at London's Southbank Centre, surely she's ideally placed to give an insight into the public/private sector argument.
I must be honest, when I first read VR's post, I fully expected to find that the authur in question was Nigel's lad, Dominic Lawson.
Ah … an article who's opening sentence would have us believe that Gordon Brown was still chancellor in the first four months of 2010. Oh yes, there's something to rely on when constructing and argument …
cod'ead wrote:It's Christina Patterson mate. As a former director of the Poetry Society, and literary programmer at London's Southbank Centre, surely she's ideally placed to give an insight into the public/private sector argument.
I must be honest, when I first read VR's post, I fully expected to find that the authur in question was Nigel's lad, Dominic Lawson.
Ah … an article who's opening sentence would have us believe that Gordon Brown was still chancellor in the first four months of 2010. Oh yes, there's something to rely on when constructing and argument …
Joined: Oct 19 2003 Posts: 17898 Location: Packed like sardines, in a tin
The Video Ref wrote:A brilliant article in The Independent today. It basically said that some in the public sector have completely unrealistic expectations.
TBH, some in the private sector have completely unrealistic expectations (and understanding) of the public sector too
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
