Dave K. wrote:Looks like it on according to the HDM, he will sign at the expense of the Sheffield player, bit harsh on him, makes you wonder who's decison it was to sign him?
Leaves you looking short at FB though, unless you can sign Mcdowell (?), you couldn't fit him under the quota could you, find it all very confusing?
Joined: Aug 14 2005 Posts: 14302 Location: On the Death Star Awaiting Luke.
Dave K. wrote:Looks like it on according to the HDM, he will sign at the expense of the Sheffield player, bit harsh on him, makes you wonder who's decison it was to sign him?
Leaves you looking short at FB though, unless you can sign Mcdowell (?), you couldn't fit him under the quota could you, find it all very confusing?
Its starting to look likely that the RFL have broken their own rules on the none-fed trained rules and anyone who has been over here for more than 3 years is off that list now.
So if that is now true then Dobson comes off. That leaves us with. Quota :- Dobson Galea Webster Green Clinton
None Fed Green Clinton Paea Taulapapa/Mika
Leaving us one None-Fed spare as Withers and O'Hara are exempt for this contract period.
I personally don't like it and I would say so to MH/MS if I could but there is little that we as fans can do about it.
Anakin Skywalker wrote:Its starting to look likely that the RFL have broken their own rules on the none-fed trained rules and anyone who has been over here for more than 3 years is off that list now.
So if that is now true then Dobson comes off. That leaves us with. Quota :- Dobson Galea Webster Green Clinton
None Fed Green Clinton Paea Taulapapa/Mika
Leaving us one None-Fed spare as Withers and O'Hara are exempt for this contract period.
I personally don't like it and I would say so to MH/MS if I could but there is little that we as fans can do about it.
I have to agree with your last comment. I hate the fact that all clubs will seemingly do anything to fill their squads with 2nd rate overseas players (hull included). Until we get away from this mentality, the quality of the British players won't improve
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12672 Location: Leicestershire.
Jake the Peg wrote:I have to agree with your last comment. I hate the fact that all clubs will seemingly do anything to fill their squads with 2nd rate overseas players (hull included). Until we get away from this mentality, the quality of the British players won't improve
The link you make between opportunities for British players and their quality, is arguably a logical fallacy. It is just as possible (more possible IMO) that the dearth of quality explains the reliance on overseas players rather than vice versa.
Giving young British players more opportunities makes sense as an end, more so than as a means.
If we put aside the goggles of patriotism for a moment, we know, deep down, that '2nd rate overseas' is by SL standards 'quite good'. That's why those whose livelihoods rely on results sign them.
That said - 11 is a lot. As long as they win games, I suppose.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Joined: Sep 06 2005 Posts: 1995 Location: Newcastle, Hunter Valley
Players like Mika are the ones you should be signing. NRL clubs have about 30 under 20s players each year, of whom maybe 10 could go on with it to be NRL standard, but at each club there are about 3 or 4 spots in the senior squad to fill each year. There are a lot of 21 and 22 year olds like Mika who could still be anything. Signing old guys who are on the downhill slide is why your comp is going backwards. If you changed the rules and plundered the NRL for promising 20 year olds you would improve rapidly.
Joined: Mar 22 2009 Posts: 2397 Location: East Hull
Where does everyone reckon he will be playing then, my guess after looking about is 2nd row - a decent size with decent speed with a great offload in the tackle.
[quote="Adeybull"] so the panel took the same view as your excellent assessment.[/quote]
Joined: Aug 21 2011 Posts: 1326 Location: East Hull
very red robin wrote:Where does everyone reckon he will be playing then, my guess after looking about is 2nd row - a decent size with decent speed with a great offload in the tackle.
2nd row makes sense but coming off the bench to make an impact. I would say the same for Paea as well, which would mean playing Galea at loose, his best position in my book.
McDonnell is all but signed up, and like the signing of Meeks I don't expect Rovers to officially announce it until they both get visas - but you never know with Smithy lol!
Looking at some of those clips i think he has the look of Sam Stewart about him. I will be very happy if he turns out to be as good as that great backrower we got from Newcastle.
"Dream Big..Work Hard".................. Sarah Storey, Paralympic Legend.
Mild Rover wrote:The link you make between opportunities for British players and their quality, is arguably a logical fallacy. It is just as possible (more possible IMO) that the dearth of quality explains the reliance on overseas players rather than vice versa.
Giving young British players more opportunities makes sense as an end, more so than as a means.
If we put aside the goggles of patriotism for a moment, we know, deep down, that '2nd rate overseas' is by SL standards 'quite good'. That's why those whose livelihoods rely on results sign them.
That said - 11 is a lot. As long as they win games, I suppose.
Maybe, or maybe clubs could invest some of tehat cash which is going overseas into improving their youth systems and likely improving teh output from them.
Not sure I agree that 2nd rate overseas is quite good by SL standards. There are plenty of overseas players in SL who are garbage
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum