Some ridiculous argument on here regarding dog attacks.
In the VERY rare occasion that they do happen (i notice the links about the poor baby in Scotland was from 2009 and i think very few willhave happened since) it is a terrible thing. Truly terrible.
However, I would say that more children are killed by car accidents, general accidents, neglect etc a year than dog attacks in a decade.
Should we ban cars and everything else?
Look at the terrible thing parents do to their children, on a more regular basis than a dog attack, look at the horrible things that happened to baby P for example. Should we ban humans from having babies?
A well trained and cared for dog becomes a member of the family. neglected dogs have behaviour issues because they aren;t taught to control them and what is acceptable behaviour!
Joined: Jun 25 2006 Posts: 14114 Location: Forum21
Finsbury Wire wrote:Some ridiculous argument on here regarding dog attacks.
In the VERY rare occasion that they do happen (i notice the links about the poor baby in Scotland was from 2009 and i think very few willhave happened since) it is a terrible thing. Truly terrible.
However, I would say that more children are killed by car accidents, general accidents, neglect etc a year than dog attacks in a decade.
Should we ban cars and everything else?
Look at the terrible thing parents do to their children, on a more regular basis than a dog attack, look at the horrible things that happened to baby P for example. Should we ban humans from having babies?
A well trained and cared for dog becomes a member of the family. neglected dogs have behaviour issues because they aren;t taught to control them and what is acceptable behaviour!
Some stupid comments on here.
Hope the two staffies find a home
Which comments are stupid? All I am suggesting is that some dogs are more dangerous by others (obviously) and usually belong to the sub-classes who do not look after them correctly and that they have killed children.
I understand the argument there are no dangerous dogs only dangerous owners but you don't see chavvy nobheads with labradors, always seems to be Staffies, Rotties and Dobermen.......wonder why?
Horatio Yed wrote:I understand the argument there are no dangerous dogs only dangerous owners but you don't see chavvy nobheads with labradors, always seems to be Staffies, Rotties and Dobermen.......wonder why?
Properly because there big, muscular dogs and do look more intimating than say a poodle or yorkie
Wires71 wrote:One "staff" tearing a child's cardio vascular system apart (as duly evidenced by the report) is one too many in my opinion. You never hear of a cat doing same. They are by logical deduction lethal. I'm sorry if I mickey you off but facts are facts. We do not have to agree nor make it personal.
The fact is they are an aggressive mammal and left in the hands of the sub-class (who incidentally can scarcely raise a child sufficiently well enough to attend school, read or write and respect law and order) they are lethal.
Why is it always these fatal/hideously marring dog attacks happen, almost without exception, within council estates? In fact why do most child abuse cases arise from the very same places?
As an educated poster like youself, I expected more from you. The bottom line is they're excellent dogs, however if they're brought up and trained to fight then they will, as will most dogs.
Wires71 wrote:Ridiculous comparison debunking Timmy the Koi's argument of canine species vs potential danger to the populous. Which one is more likely to expose your trachea (windpipe) in your opinion? If you think the same, side with Timmy.
This
or this
This is what was stupid, anyone can post two images to make one thing look worse than another, for example
versus
Everyone protect your dogs from the angry baby!
I'm not even a dog owner and can see its how you train one not the breed
Wires71 wrote:Hope they were muzzled. Reckless owners if not. Probably only realise their responsibility when said dog chews a babies face off/kills child as they seem to do with startling regularity. Owner, probably unemployed, feckless then states in stupid bewilderment "but my Fido would not normally hurt a fly".
Edit ANY DOG CAN TURN ,PITY THE HUMAN RACE IS NOT AS LOYAL AS A DOG THAT IS BROUGHT UP IN A CARING AND LOVING ENVIRONMENT, edit
No need for that
HY
Wires71 wrote:Hope they were muzzled. Reckless owners if not. Probably only realise their responsibility when said dog chews a babies face off/kills child as they seem to do with startling regularity. Owner, probably unemployed, feckless then states in stupid bewilderment "but my Fido would not normally hurt a fly".
Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher and 133 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
