WakeyManDan8 wrote:Brough and Lomax are both very different players. It depends who plays at stand off/hooker/loose forward as far as Im converned. If Sinfield is at 13, we don't need a kicker, so we should go for Lomax. If O'Loughlin is at loose, then we could use some more creativity and a better kicking game, so maybe Broughy should get a chance. I personally would go for:
6. Widdop 7. Brough 9. Roby 13. O'Loughlin
Then I'd Robinson as the interchange hooker/half back.
Rupert Pupkin wrote:Not sure that Brough has been that good in the second half of the season since coming back from injury, I would have always opted for Lomax at 7.
As for Widdop at 6, not for me, needs more time to learn the role.
Widdop has played 6 for a season at Melbourne and needs more time to learn the role, Lomax has played at 7 for one season at Saints but you'd opt for him? Widdop and Brough in the halves for me.
Old_Faithful_IAKW wrote:Widdop has played 6 for a season at Melbourne and needs more time to learn the role, Lomax has played at 7 for one season at Saints but you'd opt for him? Widdop and Brough in the halves for me.
Contradictions are never present in RL fans' opinions
Joined: Jun 21 2003 Posts: 3356 Location: M27 but not part of the project !!
Lets think Melbourne Storms first choice number 6 or Brough/Myler
It's a no brainer
The fans, the members, the people there.. from the day I stepped foot onto that field at the AJ Bell Stadium,I knew I would love that club for the rest of my life. "Jackson Hastings"..
Worry a little bit every day and in a lifetime you will lose a couple of years. If something is wrong, fix it if you can. But train yourself not to worry. Worry never fixes anything.
Mary Hemmingway, US journalist,widow of Ernest Hemmingway (1908-1986)
The Stupid Neither Forgive Nor Forget The Naive Forgive And Forget The Wise Forgive But Don't Forget
"I am not young enough to know everything" Oscar Wilde Irish Playwright (1854-1900)
One likes people much better when they're battered down by a prodigious siege of misfortune than when they triumph.
Joined: Jan 10 2007 Posts: 6766 Location: Stalking Jerry Langford
Old_Faithful_IAKW wrote:Widdop has played 6 for a season at Melbourne and needs more time to learn the role, Lomax has played at 7 for one season at Saints but you'd opt for him? Widdop and Brough in the halves for me.
Widdop was a specialist fullback wasn't he up untill this season? If you have watched the Storm this season you will tend to see Slater playing more of the role of a 6 than Widdop has done IMO. Widdop doesnt look a natural 6 at this time but has plenty of improvement in him.
Lomax is an out and out half back(maybe some Saints fan could put me straight)although he did do pretty well when played in the centres and wing but he is now showing what he is capable of playing in his natural position, unlike Widdop.
I don't see it as a job. It is a passion and love that we all share. Neil Hudgell
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 18060 Location: On the road
Willzay wrote:Who do you think should be the scrum half for England, Brough or Myler? Personally I would choose Brough because he has a decent kicking game whereas Myler doesn't and without Briers he runs around like a headless chicken.
Neither - Lomax has to partner Widdop
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
Users browsing this forum: karetaker and 34 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
_zps67e534e4.jpg)
