Bradford are claiming that they had secured Sammut before all what happened on Tuesday, I don't follow the ins and outs of other clubs contracts or even the RFLs policy on such but, How have they done this? Wouldn't Sammut have to have been given permission to talk to other clubs? Is this like the Paul Cooke saga? I can imagine that the RFL wont really care either way as this helps one of the players that they have just bent the rules to take care of.

..

Some reports have said that the dispensation is for the duration of their next contracts and then it expires, other reports have suggested the dispensation lasts for the first year only?

taken from rfl site ... http://www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/23 ... -crusaders

taken from rfl site ... http://www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/23 ... -crusaders

we need a full back... so maybe Clinton Schifcofske

.

Be good.



For the tenth time. he's retiring.



If a club gives permission for one of their players to speak to other clubs, as we did with Briscoe and Huddersfield did with Hodgson, they can do what they like.

Bradford are trying to clarify if Sammut is entitled to the same dispensation as all the other players, it would be hilarious if the RFL said no.

White, Moore and Reardon are the only ones I'd go for now.
Shifcofske would've been good for a year though.

Mark Bryant, Richard Moore, maybe Kear and White too, well probably leave it too late and get no one thou haha

What's with all the random full stops?

.
.





..

.
too used to working with other forums where the lines are not spaced and full stops or another character are needed to create spaces...
and forgot that it creates a proper link.......