Alas, Haye was never in this one. We should have watched whatever fight Dum-Dum was watching, how did that one go?

Some of the girls in the bin would of done better......very disappointing.

The sun shinning 2 Sundays in a row..think this could be some kind of record...

Nice day planned, the hammock, the suncream, and me

Still coughing and doing a spreadsheet with some fancy =correl formulae. Love working at the weekends, epic. Mr B is taking the littlest B to see Green Lantern before he throttles me. Anyone seen the Transformers film yet?

Saw it yesterday, I've not seen the others so I'm probably not the best to judge it really, but IMO it was okay. A lot of it was lost on me though for the above reason, noticed this morning The People gave it 0 stars out of 5 (for what that's worth). The 3D effects were good though.

Not seen the 3rd but the second was so much better than the first.
The first went miles away from the origional idea and it became the classic 'The Americans won the war'.
It was roundly frowned upon by the fan base, As an example Optimus Prime was totally bitched by Megatron belive me when I say that would NEVER happen Prime was imba and the only way Megatron could beat him was cheating and underhand measures something Prime was always above.
In the second film the autobots won out not the american miltary and Prime being a 'Prime' won the decisive battle.
You may all now call me a fanboy but I always find a film based on a previous successful book/film/cartoon/comic are always best keeping to the origional idea that made it successful in the first place instead of them doing the usual of 'I know better' and trying to fix something that isn't broken.

Blimey.


Christ, I've unleashed the beast here. I thought they were just little plastic cars you turned into robots then had the devil's own job to try and twist them back into the the shape from whence they came. You should do Pokemon - that's serious stuff in terms of criteria and relative skill sets. I'll buy you the Pokedex for Christmas. Astounding facts in there, let me tell you.

Is that a swear filter substitute?

David Haye was exposed as the idiot he is with his false promises of attacking and destroying Klitschko. He claimed he would be like an animal in the ring but who could of guessed he ment Bambi on ice, falling every time Klitschko got a grip of him and his poorly toe...

Apologies on mistaking the brothers although either of them would have done the same job, loud mouth southerner silenced.

Sorry to bother you, but...

Do you understand how tax works on redundancy payments? If 'no', please ignore.

I understand the first £30,000 is tax free. After that, it counts as normal income and is taxed alongside your wage for that tax year, is that right????? I've looked around online and it is a bit vague. Mrs MR, whose redundancy it would be, has a different interpretation that I don't understand - much to her chagrin.

Mild Rover wrote:Sorry to bother you, but... Do you understand how tax works on redundancy payments? If 'no', please ignore. I understand the first £30,000 is tax free. After that, it counts as normal income and is taxed alongside your wage for that tax year, is that right????? I've looked around online and it is a bit vague. Mrs MR, whose redundancy it would be, has a different interpretation that I don't understand - much to her chagrin. Your understanding is the same as mine - not sure if this helps: http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/guidance/redunda ... tsheet.pdf

Mild Rover wrote:Sorry to bother you, but... Do you understand how tax works on redundancy payments? If 'no', please ignore. I understand the first £30,000 is tax free. After that, it counts as normal income and is taxed alongside your wage for that tax year, is that right????? I've looked around online and it is a bit vague. Mrs MR, whose redundancy it would be, has a different interpretation that I don't understand - much to her chagrin. Your understanding is the same as mine - not sure if this helps: http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/guidance/redunda ... tsheet.pdf