gingerspice wrote:So RW that would mean rovers did not have to ask for special dispensation from the rfl that would make sense then, and rovers are in fact doing nothing wrong.
Tbf, it's a lot of speculation based on limited information. My criticism of the HDM is that they seem to be focussing
solely on the most negative possible outcomes. Now, they may be party to info that I'm not but if they are, they aren't saying what. Also they have already changed their tune once.
Until the passport arrives there isn't anything that can be done. If and when it does the RFL
might refuse to re-register Mason. However, the assumption that they
definately won't is based on some questionable assumptions, IMO.
1. It is Rovers fault that Mason requires a Tongan passport. It is not the club's or player's fault it has not been issued - the circumstances are exceptional. The club messed up - but not as badly as has been portrayed by some.
2. That refusing to register Mason would not be potentially problematic for the RFL. I think it
might. None of this is his fault.