Mrs Barista wrote:I'm not really sure what your point is. I've already said Saints have the better pack on paper and the game is won in the forwards generally. Your HB combination sees your first choice 6 and a very experienced LF/SO whereas Saints are fielding neither of Pryce or Eastmond. It's a big call to say Gaskell is a better player than Murrell IMO. Back lines look reasonably well matched but Saints on balance are favourites in what should be a good game. No need to get huffy and use capitals. I think I've been pretty balanced tbh.

Mrs Barista wrote:Eh? Pryce or Eastmond?

For the avoidance of doubt, Roverswall, this is not a bitchathon. Just a polite enquiry about Saints HBs. My assessment above of the relative merits of both teams is sensible, balanced and non-inflammatory. Thanks.

calta wrote:Another total loss and how low can you go as a team