If our previous contracts are anything to go by what constitues 'strict rules'? How about, 'You have to sign it', is that stict enough?

we are fairly well covered for centres , so no

But he would be an improvement to any of ours IMO.

not for the money he'd be asking imo

or is age, or his commitment

He's not as good as you all think he is. I rember him at Warrington. He had more average games that 'good' games IMO.