I would continue to use Mason in the same way he was today, just with slightly longer spells as his match fitness improves. I have no doubt that he could play for the 80 minutes but wouldnt imagine that his impact would be anywhere near the same. We signed him for, and need, his impact.

Sheldon your quoting NRL against SL here, and has people keep saying NRL is still a lot more quicker than SL, i think if player feels he is up to doing a good job for 80 mins so be it, like i have said on another post Mason was up and down the touch line like a lion stalking its prey,lets see how the next few weeks go, if we have lost Newts for a few weeks i for one would be happy with Willie doing 60 mins at least.

No Judiciary for any of our players, although crusaders have one for high tackle on Webster, a couple of other clubs have a couple up also, although i can see a bit of dispensation coming up.... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 424739.stm

No Judiciary for any of our players, although crusaders have one for high tackle on Webster, a couple of other clubs have a couple up also, although i can see a bit of dispensation coming up.... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 424739.stm

id give young Taylor a go from the start next week, would be tempted to leave Charlie out too.