Oh yeah!

Excellent. Considering we are up to full cap are we to assume he's on 3 stellas per game played? If so fantastic business.

did we get an answer for the 8 club trained (3 years in acadamy and under 21) players? watts, latus, sheriffe, peterson, cox,

Just wrote a lengthy explanation, only for the computer to swallow it. The rules were brought in gradually and we have a player on a dispensation.

Murrell (20 in 2006, which qualifies him)
Lovegrove (dispensation)

Welham, Watts, Latus, Sheriff, Peterson, Cox, Beaumont, Taylor.

That leaves 18 of the 28 man first team squad, only 17 of whom can be in the top 25 earners. Hodgson I assume must still be on an equivalent deal to Taylor, Cox et al.

forgot about Taylor. Welham, Murrell and Beaumont over 21 so wouldn't count, surely?

Erm why would Welham ever come off that list?

Me thinks you dont quite understand the rule; you dont still have to be under 21 you know... so Welham been at KR will always count

i reckon Tansey could end up at Crusaders, if they cant get all there Aussies over here that is, i think they have 3 players held up in Aus waiting for them.

Widnes/Fax, someone looking to come up into SL is all i can see.

Not a chance we'd take the risk on him, would only be a squad player for us; so 100% is not worth the risk.

hes great with the ball in hand, far better then Briscoe IMO, but its his high ball catching that lets him down, as well as his drinking problems obviously. you only have to look at the stats for Hull last year, hes up there in nearly all of them, he was up there in the trys, metres, breaks, tackle busts, so hes definatly a very good player. BUT not for us.