Joined: Sep 23 2006 Posts: 8033 Location: sea level once again
tonylRobin wrote:you cant beat a bit of banter, the problem is that a lot of poeple on here dont no what it is and everything turns into a childish arguement,
Joined: Jan 30 2009 Posts: 361 Location: a blacknwhite in the east
SirStan wrote:
Eddie Marks wrote:ok fella, point taken.clint newton is ok but hardly a legend.even as a hull fan i know he'd never make your all time best 13/17. so hes hardly hkr legendtata 4 now ps. pointless twice in the same sentence shows this is effecting your mental health. i advise bed rest
Is that the definition of "legend"?
James Webster & Stanley Gene have just had their status revoked thanks to Eddie & his Definitions!
given what youve achieved in the past i didnt think you considered them legends. youve had far better players in their respective positions, and neither spent most of their career at cp,though them being well liked is understandable.same with newton.thought your legends would be of the calibre of say millward,lowe,sullivan etc if you base legendary status on playing ability ,achievments or a local lad coming good.
Joined: Sep 23 2006 Posts: 8033 Location: sea level once again
Personally I think it's an overused term. However, in terms of positive impact on the club during his time with us I would put James Webster up there with any of them.
Joined: Oct 15 2008 Posts: 1944 Location: east hull
certain players come to a club, and become legends, Sir Stanley Gene is one of those players, a living legend. Newtons maybe not in that position yet though but hes defo a fans favorite.
Joined: Jan 16 2010 Posts: 7138 Location: Ramsey Street, Brough
tonylRobin wrote:certain players come to a club, and become legends, Sir Stanley Gene is one of those players, a living legend. Newtons maybe not in that position yet though but hes defo a fans favorite.
Course he is there is no other player that is more Hull Kr than newts he just loves it when he runs out onto the pitch to mean machine
Joined: Mar 22 2009 Posts: 2397 Location: East Hull
gingerspice wrote:Course he is there is no other player that is more Hull Kr than newts he just loves it when he runs out onto the pitch to mean machine
What a complete load of tripe, yes hes a fans favourite but by no means is he a rovers legend!!!
Gene and Webster are the only 2 of late imo.
[quote="Adeybull"] so the panel took the same view as your excellent assessment.[/quote]
Joined: Sep 18 2005 Posts: 8742 Location: 2017 City of Culture
very red robin wrote:Gene and Webster are the only 2 of late imo.
Agreed.
Its not a straightforward question of ability or acheivement when attaining "legend" status IMO. Paul Fletcher is a legend primarily for excess loyalty in the dark days when most players of his undoubted quality would have gone elsewhere.
Joined: Jan 15 2007 Posts: 11924 Location: Secret Hill Top Lair. V.2
SirStan wrote:Agreed.
Its not a straightforward question of ability or acheivement when attaining "legend" status IMO. Paul Fletcher is a legend primarily for excess loyalty in the dark days when most players of his undoubted quality would have gone elsewhere.
I think he should have gone, wasted his talent staying with us and would have got international recognition at a bigger club.
I was sad when Anthony Sullivan left, but pleased for him and his career.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 63 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
