Ok why pick rovers over saints they have not been financially stable last two seasons so let's put saints in there to.

OK no probs, add Saints to that list. It doesn't disguise the fact fact that some of the reasons many are saying Wakey will lose their license also applies to a number of other clubs.

I personally would keep Wakey and dump Quins.

You mean the bill that has been paid in full

Get ready for the tax man in the sport there are some big bills to be paid Wakey was the lowest thats why the HMRC came for them to get a judgment, the bill was paid but who will be next?

Yep you could be right there

Didn't say it hadn't been paid, it just needed the threat of court action before sir rodney came to the rescue.

Think you might be mistaken there. IIRC the RFL is currently supporting a test case involving Leeds.

Really? (and I don't mean I don't believe you), Interesting times.

With all due respect I am not. The issue you refer to is the different levels of tax for image rights relating to Rugby Union and higher rates for Rugby League. The test case with Leeds is because the owners have RU and RL they are trying to get the same level of tax for RL as RU.

This distinguishes it from Wakefield's case that is purely RL rumours floating about about at least one club owing a 7 figure sum. Not going to name the club but its not your team.

Mm so which club then

Fair enough - that's why I said IIRC. I had heard that as well as levelling the RU and RL image rights there was a more general aspect to the case.

Interesting times.